2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00678.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Monte Carlo inversion of surface wave data

Abstract: Inversion of surface wave data suffers from solution non‐uniqueness and is hence strongly biased by the initial model. The Monte Carlo approach can handle this non‐uniqueness by evidencing the local minima but it is inefficient for high dimensionality problems and makes use of subjective criteria, such as misfit thresholds, to interpret the results. If a smart sampling of the model parameter space, which exploits scale properties of the modal curves, is introduced the method becomes more efficient and with res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
77
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Foti et al (2009) surface wave dispersion curves were inverted using a Monte Carlo inversion (Socco and Boiero, 2008) that selects a set of equivalent possible solutions through a statistical test. All the equivalent solutions were then used to compute the 1D seismic response of the site.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Foti et al (2009) surface wave dispersion curves were inverted using a Monte Carlo inversion (Socco and Boiero, 2008) that selects a set of equivalent possible solutions through a statistical test. All the equivalent solutions were then used to compute the 1D seismic response of the site.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is growing interest in surface waves in seismic exploration, for instance for velocity analysis of the reservoir overburden (e.g., Campman and Riyanti, 2007;Socco and Boiero, 2008), and the GF reconstruction method can be used to enhance active source experiments. In this context, it is sometimes referred to as seismic interferometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using surface waves dispersion curves inversion, it is commonly hypothesized that S-wave velocity is constant in each layer (e.g. Socco & Boiero 2008) even if a gradient can be also implemented in each layer (e.g. Wathelet et al 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%