1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(19991201)37:4<530::aid-prot4>3.3.co;2-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved modeling of side‐chains in proteins with rotamer‐based methods: A flexible rotamer model

Abstract: Side-chain modeling has a widespread application in many current methods for protein tertiary structure determination, prediction, and design. Of the existing side-chain modeling methods, rotamer-based methods are the fastest and most efficient. Classically, a rotamer is conceived as a single, rigid conformation of an amino acid sidechain. Here, we present a flexible rotamer model in which a rotamer is a continuous ensemble of conformations that cluster around the classic rigid rotamer. We have developed a the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
63
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Twenty-five of the 30 carefully selected proteins, which could be operated by all programs, were calculated and averaged. The computational results of Holm and Sander (1991), SCWRL (Bower et al 1997), Mendes et al (1999), and this work were equally evaluated as described earlier. The computing time was counted on a Silicon graphic 400MHZ IP30 processor.…”
Section: Modeling the Side Chains For A Whole Proteinmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Twenty-five of the 30 carefully selected proteins, which could be operated by all programs, were calculated and averaged. The computational results of Holm and Sander (1991), SCWRL (Bower et al 1997), Mendes et al (1999), and this work were equally evaluated as described earlier. The computing time was counted on a Silicon graphic 400MHZ IP30 processor.…”
Section: Modeling the Side Chains For A Whole Proteinmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…We compared our program with the torso program from the MAXSPROUT package (Holm and Sander 1991), SCWRL2.2 (Bower et al 1997), and that of Mendes et al (1999). Like our method, torso was based on the Monte Carlo algorithm.…”
Section: Modeling the Side Chains For A Whole Proteinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the current rotamer library's best possible RMSD for the tested proteins (found by positioning the rotamer that is closest to the x-ray structure) is between 0.94 Å to 1.52 Å. A way to overcome the search-space limitation was suggested by Mendes et al (52); it presents a rotamer as a continuous ensemble of conformations that cluster around the classic rigid rotamer. A different approach to expanding the search space was recently devised by Honig and coworkers (19), which achieved accurate predictions by using an extensive rotamer library containing over 7,560 members, in which bond lengths and bond angles were taken from the database rather than simply assuming idealized values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several representations of side-chain flexibility incorporating multiple higher-energy conformations have been used in prediction and design [20][21][22][23] . However, the predictions resulting from models commonly used in protein design simulations have not been directly compared to experimental data on the amplitude of side-chain motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%