2022
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2021.3126589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Model Predictive Control for Three-Phase Dual-Active-Bridge Converters With a Hybrid Modulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MPC tries to produce proper output signals by predicting the states of the system and the future value of that. MPC can be deployed in different types of applications, e.g., energy management of an electrified powertrain to climate control [42], control of three-phase dual-active-bridge converters [43], control of drive systems [44], control of the energy storage systems [45], improvement of the cybersecurity of DC microgrids [46], and sensorless control of DC microgrids [47]. There are some types of MPC-based controllers, and based on the application, the proper type of MPC can be selected.…”
Section: Control Of Pe Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MPC tries to produce proper output signals by predicting the states of the system and the future value of that. MPC can be deployed in different types of applications, e.g., energy management of an electrified powertrain to climate control [42], control of three-phase dual-active-bridge converters [43], control of drive systems [44], control of the energy storage systems [45], improvement of the cybersecurity of DC microgrids [46], and sensorless control of DC microgrids [47]. There are some types of MPC-based controllers, and based on the application, the proper type of MPC can be selected.…”
Section: Control Of Pe Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, control methods for 3-phase DAB converters primarily aim at extending the Zero Voltage Switching (ZVS) range [8][9][10] or involve strategies for detecting emergency states [11]. These control approaches leverage various modulators, ranging from fundamental Single-Phase Shift (SPS) to more sophisticated methods like those discussed in [12][13][14][15], all relying on either current or voltage-current control loops. However, such solutions lack the desired flexibility, limiting their applicability across a diverse range of scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to 1-phase DAB systems, conventional modulation methods such as Dual Phase Shift (DPS) and Triple Phase Shift (TPS) are not compatible with 3-phase setups. The distinct structure of the three-phase bridge prohibits the utilization of the same equations and relationships employed in the single-phase system [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, traditional droop control is incapable of coordinating dc voltage regulation, frequency support, and power dispatch. When it comes to frequency support, numerous studies have found that control schemes that provide frequency support have a very positive impact [13][14][15][16]. Paper [17] uses pilot voltage droop (PVD) control to enhance the dc voltage regulation and frequency deviation sharing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%