2016
DOI: 10.5121/ijdkp.2016.6602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Micro-Blog Classification for Detecting Abusive Arabic Twitter Accounts

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They created their own test set and made it publicly available. Then in [58] Abozinadah and H. Jones, Jr. enhanced the previous work by proposing a lexicon that is fed by an Arabic word correction method to enhance the detection of such abusive words. A third work by Abozinadah is [59] which used statistical learning approach for the detection process to overcome the limitation in the BOW approach presented in other previous works.…”
Section: Arabic Anti-social Behaviour Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They created their own test set and made it publicly available. Then in [58] Abozinadah and H. Jones, Jr. enhanced the previous work by proposing a lexicon that is fed by an Arabic word correction method to enhance the detection of such abusive words. A third work by Abozinadah is [59] which used statistical learning approach for the detection process to overcome the limitation in the BOW approach presented in other previous works.…”
Section: Arabic Anti-social Behaviour Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes, people knowingly misspell a censor word by adding additional character or deleting one or more character to avoid flame detection. Such kind of behaviour has been reported from Arabic-language tweets [16,17]. Eventually such forms of communication degrade the sense of camaraderie among friends, business people and others.…”
Section: Flaming In Chatting Applications and Flame Detector Toolmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The detection of offensive language that includes personal attacks, demeaning comments, or hateful language is left for future work. Unlike previous work on obscenity and offensive language detection for different languages, such as English (Mahmud et al, 2008;Spertus, 2007;Xiang et al, 2012) and German (Ross et al, 2016), very limited previous work for this task was done for Arabic (Abozinadah et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%