1979
DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(79)90344-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved methods for supergraphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

18
794
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 891 publications
(816 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
18
794
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This result reveals unsolved theoretical problems which appear if DRED is used for the regularization of SUSY theories. N = 1 SUSY leads to the absence of divergent quantum corrections to the superpotential [29]. Another interesting feature of N = 1 SYM models is existence of the exact relation between the β-function and the anomalous dimension of the matter superfields, derived in Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This result reveals unsolved theoretical problems which appear if DRED is used for the regularization of SUSY theories. N = 1 SUSY leads to the absence of divergent quantum corrections to the superpotential [29]. Another interesting feature of N = 1 SYM models is existence of the exact relation between the β-function and the anomalous dimension of the matter superfields, derived in Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In particular, its nonrenormalization properties [1,2] and its potential for solving the hierarchy problem [3][4][5][6] make it appealing as an ingredient of phenomenology, enabling a description in terms of weakly coupled degrees of freedom. In practice however, the implementation of the principle requires breaking supersymmetry in a hidden sector and communicating the effects to observed phenomenology indirectly; for reviews see [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of the non-renormalisation theorem can be found in [21], where supersymmetric perturbation theory was used. Seiberg, avoiding the technicalities of super Feynman rules, presented in [22] and [23] an alternative derivation.…”
Section: Wilsonian and 1pi Superpotentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seiberg, avoiding the technicalities of super Feynman rules, presented in [22] and [23] an alternative derivation. Since we are mostly interested in perturbative effects we will follow [21] and state the non renormalisation theorem as follows: All contributions to the Wilsonian effective action from loop diagrams are of the form A G = d 4 θd 4 x 1 ...d 4 x n G(x 1 , ..., x n , θ,θ), (2.1) and involve an integral over all of superspace. In particular, no contributions arise of the form A W = d 2 θd 4 x 1 ...d 4 x n W (x 1 , ..., x n , θ) + c.c., (2.2) where the integral is only over the chiral subspace of superspace.…”
Section: Wilsonian and 1pi Superpotentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%