1998
DOI: 10.1071/a97010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved methods for predicting individual leaf area and leaf senescence in maize (Zea mays)

Abstract: The ability to predict leaf area and leaf area index is crucial in crop simulation models that predict crop growth and yield. Previous studies have shown existing methods of predicting leaf area to be inadequate when applied to a broad range of cultivars with different numbers of leaves. The objectives of the study were to (i) develop generalised methods of modelling individual and total plant leaf area, and leaf senescence, that do not require constants that are specific to environments and/or genotypes, (ii)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in leaf size were related to differences in leaf number per culm, evidenced by the positive relationship between averaged TLN and APL values ( r = 0.70*, n = 81) for the nine hybrids (data not shown). The observed relationship between TLN and APL is due largely to the association between area of the largest leaf and TLN, as reported for sorghum by Carberry et al (1993) This is consistent with findings of Birch et al (1998) in a study of five maize hybrids varying in maturity and adaptation. It is also consistent with the studies at whole plant level of Hammer et al (1993) on sorghum, where maximum TPLA was related to TLN and CNPP.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Differences in leaf size were related to differences in leaf number per culm, evidenced by the positive relationship between averaged TLN and APL values ( r = 0.70*, n = 81) for the nine hybrids (data not shown). The observed relationship between TLN and APL is due largely to the association between area of the largest leaf and TLN, as reported for sorghum by Carberry et al (1993) This is consistent with findings of Birch et al (1998) in a study of five maize hybrids varying in maturity and adaptation. It is also consistent with the studies at whole plant level of Hammer et al (1993) on sorghum, where maximum TPLA was related to TLN and CNPP.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Available data on LAI over the crop cycle were then used to test the capacity of the model to regenerate leaf area responses to density. The bell‐shaped curve for individual leaf area (LA N ) against leaf number ( N ) was defined by the equation (Dwyer and Stewart, 1986; Birch et al, 1998): LAN=LAmax{exp[ a(Nxnormalo)2|b(Nxnormalo)3 ] }where LA max is the area of the largest leaf, x o is the position (leaf number) of the largest leaf, and a and b are fitted coefficients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring leaf area was done with a ruler and calculated using the following equation (Birch, Hammer, and Rickert 1998;Montgomery 1911): Leaf area (cm 2 ) = leaf length × leaf width × 0.75.…”
Section: Leaf Area (La)mentioning
confidence: 99%