2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.88.025018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved methods for hypergraphs

Abstract: We introduce a new background field method for N=2 superspace. (We treat projective hyperspace, but similar remarks apply for the harmonic case.) In analogy to N=1, background gauge fields are in the real representation, so the lowest-dimension potentials are spinor and the usual non-renormalization theorems are manifest. Another consequence is that the R-coordinates disappear from the effective action.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in order to do the power counting. For that the naive real superspace R 4|8 that we use here might be way too complicated [39] and one should maybe instead turn to the N = 2 Harmonic [47] or Projective [44,54,55] superspace formalism.…”
Section: A Non-renormalization Theoremmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…in order to do the power counting. For that the naive real superspace R 4|8 that we use here might be way too complicated [39] and one should maybe instead turn to the N = 2 Harmonic [47] or Projective [44,54,55] superspace formalism.…”
Section: A Non-renormalization Theoremmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…What is more, background field formalism makes gauge invariance manifest and when combined with supersymmetry leads to very powerful non-renormalization theorems that explain many "miraculous cancellations" 10 [35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. For a more modern approach on the background field method (BFM) in N = 2 superspace the interested reader can see [42,43] for Harmonic and [44] for Projective superspace.…”
Section: Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplicity, we present only the Yang Mills part of the theory, but the procedure carries over to quarks and also to supersymmetric N = 1 and N = 2 theories in the appropriate superspace [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: The Diagrammatic Argument and The Power Of Gauge Invariancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these cases, the Killing potential may be chosen in special form D ++ r = − 1 2 Q + a J a+ r . 17 When the Lagrangian is superconformal, this is always possible. By taking (6.16) and replacing one δ with a gauge transformation and the other with a dilatation, one may find the special form of the moment map on a hyperkähler cone,…”
Section: Jhep03(2016)107mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This expression also follows by replacing the variations in (6.16) with D 0 v and D −− v : in other words, the function K is a component of the pullback of Ω ++ to the complex harmonic manifold. 17 This choice for the Killing potential is actually always possible provided we do not adopt the special gauge L + a = Q + a . As is familiar from Kähler target spaces in N = 1 theories [64], it is possible to introduce non-dynamical multiplets with vanishing kinetic terms whose sole purpose is to render the Lagrangian completely gauge invariant, so that minimal substitution may proceed.…”
Section: Jhep03(2016)107mentioning
confidence: 99%