2020
DOI: 10.1177/1847979020980928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved method on image stitching based on optical flow algorithm

Abstract: With the rapid development of technologies based on virtual reality, image stitching is widely used in various fields such as broadcasting, games, education, and architecture. Image stitching is a method for connecting multiple images to produce a high-resolution image and a wide field of view image. It is common for most of the stitching methods to find and match the feature in the image. However, these stitching methods have the disadvantage that they cannot create a perfect 360-degree panoramic image becaus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These feature matching methods can be divided into two main subsections based on their feature detection method, namely, learning-based feature detection methods and methods which do not incorporate learning. Traditional methods, such as frequency domain methods [ 38 ], spatial domain methods [ 39 ], optical flow methods [ 40 ], Scale-Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) [ 39 ], Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF) [ 41 ], Harris corner detection [ 42 ], Features from Accelerated Segment Test (FAST) [ 43 ], Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK) [ 44 ] and Oriented FAST and Rotated BRIEF (ORB) [ 45 ], fall under the heading of non-learning-based methods. With the progress of deep learning technologies, more sophisticated methods of feature detection and matching have been introduced to address drawbacks in non-learning-based methods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These feature matching methods can be divided into two main subsections based on their feature detection method, namely, learning-based feature detection methods and methods which do not incorporate learning. Traditional methods, such as frequency domain methods [ 38 ], spatial domain methods [ 39 ], optical flow methods [ 40 ], Scale-Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) [ 39 ], Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF) [ 41 ], Harris corner detection [ 42 ], Features from Accelerated Segment Test (FAST) [ 43 ], Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK) [ 44 ] and Oriented FAST and Rotated BRIEF (ORB) [ 45 ], fall under the heading of non-learning-based methods. With the progress of deep learning technologies, more sophisticated methods of feature detection and matching have been introduced to address drawbacks in non-learning-based methods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other feature detection algorithms have been created subsequently, including speed up robust feature (SURF), oriented BRIEF (ORB), and features from accelerated segment test (FAST), which are used to categorize images based on their distinct properties, such as brightness, image size, and rotation. Once these features have been identified, a descriptor is generated for each feature by calculating its relationship with the surrounding pixels, which describes the feature information [12].…”
Section: Feature Detection Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final projection is considered distortion free, up to a scale factor, and the relative orientation of the different cameras is estimate during the stitching phase (Fangi and Nardinocchi, 2013). Since consumergrade spherical cameras are not designed for metric purposes, several works investigate the possibility of using such instruments for photogrammetric applications, mainly working in two directions: (i) the implementation of more sophisticated algorithms and solutions for image stitching (Lee et al, 2020), and (ii) the improvement of photogrammetric techniques for processing these types of images (Fangi et al, 2018;Janiszewski et al 2022). Indeed, even if the mathematical framework for spherical images is well-defined, some practical aspects may pose significant issues.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%