2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00340-016-6446-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved measurement precision in decay time-based phosphor thermometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, systematic errors can contribute to the uncertainty. The influence of the laser energy has been investigated for some phosphors before (for example SV67 [27], YAG:Dy and YAG:Eu [28] and CdWO 4 [29]). Considering pulse-to-pulse laser energy fluctuations of less than 10%, the contribution is well below 0.1 % and therefore of minor importance.…”
Section: Calibration and Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, systematic errors can contribute to the uncertainty. The influence of the laser energy has been investigated for some phosphors before (for example SV67 [27], YAG:Dy and YAG:Eu [28] and CdWO 4 [29]). Considering pulse-to-pulse laser energy fluctuations of less than 10%, the contribution is well below 0.1 % and therefore of minor importance.…”
Section: Calibration and Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering pulse-to-pulse laser energy fluctuations of less than 10%, the contribution is well below 0.1 % and therefore of minor importance. Differences in the detection system (for example PMT and oscilloscope settings) can cause systematic errors of several Kelvin [29]. Furthermore the data evaluation procedure influences the obtained decay rate.…”
Section: Calibration and Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BGO scintillator used in this study was characterized in an optical He flow cryostat using a calibrated Cernox temperature sensor from Lakeshore. Since the accuracy of the calibration may be affected by factors other than temperature (Abou Nada et al, 2016), it is important to ensure that the calibration is carried out under the same conditions as during real measurements. This requirement is rather difficult to satisfy as the setup used for the calibration measurements differs from the thermometry system described in the previous section.…”
Section: Sensor Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these earlier studies only investigated detection system effects at a fixed or slightly varying decay times. Furthermore, these studies did not always sufficiently decouple the effects due to changing phosphorescence intensity, PMT gain and laser fluence [6,[8][9][10][11]. The importance of decoupling these factors becomes evident when studying the relation between laser fluence and measured decay time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%