2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.10.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved measurement of LINE-1 sequence methylation for cancer detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To improve the efficiency of detecting cancer DNA and to measure the overall methylation level, we recently classified LINE1s into 4 groups based on the methylation statuses of 2 CpG dinucleotides in each LINE-1 sequence. These 4 classes were hypermethylation ( m C m C), hypomethylation ( u C u C), and 2 forms of partial methylation ( m C u C and u C m C) (Pobsook, 2011;Kitkumthorn, 2012). We found that differences in the LINE-1 methylation pattern could be observed even if the overall levels were unchanged.…”
Section: Line-1 and Alu Methylation Patterns In Lymph Node Metastasesmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To improve the efficiency of detecting cancer DNA and to measure the overall methylation level, we recently classified LINE1s into 4 groups based on the methylation statuses of 2 CpG dinucleotides in each LINE-1 sequence. These 4 classes were hypermethylation ( m C m C), hypomethylation ( u C u C), and 2 forms of partial methylation ( m C u C and u C m C) (Pobsook, 2011;Kitkumthorn, 2012). We found that differences in the LINE-1 methylation pattern could be observed even if the overall levels were unchanged.…”
Section: Line-1 and Alu Methylation Patterns In Lymph Node Metastasesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…We found that differences in the LINE-1 methylation pattern could be observed even if the overall levels were unchanged. Furthermore, partial methylation contributed to differences in the overall methylation levels between various normal tissue types, oral epithelium and white blood cells (Pobsook, 2011). Finally, for cancer DNA detection, % u C u C is more sensitive and specific than the methylation level (Pobsook, 2011;Kitkumthorn, 2012).…”
Section: Line-1 and Alu Methylation Patterns In Lymph Node Metastasesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…44,48 In their recent study, Pobsook et al found that the methylation pattern of LINE-1 can distinguish cancer cell DNA from normal cell DNA in addition to the methylation level. 49 They performed a COBRA assay examining the methylation of two CpG sites of LINE-1; their method provides molecule-based information regarding the methylation statuses of the two CpG sites, enabling the classification of individual LINE-1 alleles into three groups according to the methylation pattern of the two CpG sites: hypomethylated, partially methylated, and hypermethylated LINE-1 loci. They found that the proportion of hypomethylated LINE-1 loci outperformed the overall methylation level of LINE-1 with respect to sensitivity and specificity of cancer detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the proportion of hypomethylated LINE-1 loci outperformed the overall methylation level of LINE-1 with respect to sensitivity and specificity of cancer detection. 26,49 Although pyrosequencing is a well-established and validated method for quantifying methylation levels in individual CpG sites, it does not provide information regarding the moleculebased methylation status of multiple CpG sites or the proportion of hypomethylated LINE-1 loci. For the application of LINE-1 methylation status as a biomarker in clinical samples, a methodology enabling the rapid, reproducible, and quantitative assessment of LINE-1 methylation in large samples is required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%