The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2009
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Measurement of Drug Exposure in the Brain Using Drug-Specific Correction for Residual Blood

Abstract: A major challenge associated with the determination of the unbound brain-to-plasma concentration ratio of a drug (K p,uu,brain ), is the error associated with correction for the drug in various vascular spaces of the brain, i.e., in residual blood. The apparent brain vascular spaces of plasma water (V water , 10.3 lL/g brain), plasma proteins (V protein , 7.99 lL/g brain), and the volume of erythrocytes (V er , 2.13 lL/g brain) were determined and incorporated into a novel, drug-specific correction model that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
102
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unbound fraction of TREO and S,S-EBDM determined in vitro in the rat plasma and brain homogenate was practically equal to 1, regardless of the analytes concentration applied ( Table 2). The f u value of the compounds in the CSF, calculated on the basis of their f u in plasma (Fridén et al, 2010), also amounted to 1. As a consequence, the total concentrations of TREO and S,S-EBDM determined in the plasma, brain tissue, and CSF of the rats that received TREO, exactly reflected the free drug concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unbound fraction of TREO and S,S-EBDM determined in vitro in the rat plasma and brain homogenate was practically equal to 1, regardless of the analytes concentration applied ( Table 2). The f u value of the compounds in the CSF, calculated on the basis of their f u in plasma (Fridén et al, 2010), also amounted to 1. As a consequence, the total concentrations of TREO and S,S-EBDM determined in the plasma, brain tissue, and CSF of the rats that received TREO, exactly reflected the free drug concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Levels of the analytes in the brain tissue were calculated knowing that 1 mM in the brain homogenate supernatant was equivalent to 6 mmol/kg in the brain tissue. The total concentrations in brain tissue were corrected for the analytes present in residual brain blood using the method described by Fridén et al (2010):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For all studies, no brain perfusion occurred before brain tissue extraction for compound quantification, and no correction (Brown et al, 1986;Fridén et al, 2010) was made to the measured C b for compound in the analyzed brain tissue's capillary blood. Thus, all reported C b values include compound in brain vasculature spaces within the collected tissue.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total brain drug concentration was corrected for the residual blood in the brain vasculature by subtracting 1.03% of the plasma concentration determined in the corresponding samples (Fridén et al, 2010). The AUC values were calculated using the trapezoid rule from 0 to 3 h.…”
Section: Chemicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%