2016
DOI: 10.2144/000114389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Lysis of Single Bacterial Cells by a Modified Alkaline-Thermal Shock Procedure

Abstract: Single-cell genomics (SCG) is a recently developed tool to study the genomes of unculturable bacterial species. SCG relies on multiple-strand displacement amplification (MDA), PCR, and next-generation sequencing (NGS); however, obtaining sufficient amounts of high-quality DNA from samples is a major challenge when performing this technique. Here we present an improved bacterial cell lysing procedure that combines incubation in an alkaline buffer with a thermal shock (freezing/heating) treatment to yield highly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chemicals including phenol and spermine have been proven effective for degrading bacterial cell walls, however, due to the toxicity, a fume hood is required, thus, making it difficult to use in microfluidic systems. Freeze-thaw combined with alkaline treatment has been proven highly efficient for the lysis of bacterial single cells for SC-WGA in well plates [ 43 ], but requires placing the plates in −80 °C freezer for 1 h, therefore it is not applicable for microfluidic experimental setups with complex controls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chemicals including phenol and spermine have been proven effective for degrading bacterial cell walls, however, due to the toxicity, a fume hood is required, thus, making it difficult to use in microfluidic systems. Freeze-thaw combined with alkaline treatment has been proven highly efficient for the lysis of bacterial single cells for SC-WGA in well plates [ 43 ], but requires placing the plates in −80 °C freezer for 1 h, therefore it is not applicable for microfluidic experimental setups with complex controls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in this work, we develop a bacterial single-cell lysis protocol as a guideline for MDA-based bacterial SC-WGA in microfluidic platforms that produces >25 ng of genomic DNA per cell, sufficient for downstream library preparation. This on-chip protocol combines three primary bacterial lysis methods which include thermal [ 15 , 43 , 44 ], enzymatic [ 45 , 46 ] and chemical lysis [ 47 , 48 , 49 ] and was tested on both gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial species for subsequent on-chip SC-WGA. In this study, Corynebacterium glutamicum was used as a typical gram-positive model whose cell wall is thicker than most gram-negative species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…i After quality assessment, trimming, and/or normalization of the sequencing reads, bioinformatics tools can conduct the assembly, ORF calling, and annotation of the genes, as well as pathway reconstruction and gene comparisons. Created with BioRender method; however, more efficient lysis of cells from complex communities can be accomplished by using a combination of different lysis methods (i.e., physical-like freeze-thaw cycles, chemical, or enzymatic) (Hall et al 2013;He et al 2016;Stepanauskas et al 2017).…”
Section: Technical Problems Recent Advances and Future Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, rRNA and tRNA molecules usually represent over 90% of total RNA, but offer limited biological information and should be excluded in the amplification process, as most researches focus on mRNA and other rare molecules. With a complicated cell wall, harsher conditions are typically required to lyze a microbial cell, which may lead to damage or loss of RNA, and accuracy and efficiency of the downstream transcriptomic analysis ( Khan and Yadav, 2004 ; Hall et al, 2013 ; Heera et al, 2015 ; He et al, 2016 ). More importantly, unlike genomic analysis, in which the methods for mammalian cells could be also readily applied to prokaryotic microbes, not all methods for mammalian single-cell transcriptomic analysis could be used to microbes.…”
Section: Tools For Transcriptomic Analysis At Single-cell Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%