2017
DOI: 10.1137/16m1095810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Lower Bounds for Kissing Numbers in Dimensions 25 through 31

Abstract: Abstract. The best previous lower bounds for kissing numbers in dimensions 25-31 were constructed using a set S with |S| = 480 of minimal vectors of the Leech Lattice, Λ 24 , such that x, y ≤ 1 for any distinct x, y ∈ S. Then, a probabilistic argument based on applying automorphisms of Λ 24 gives more disjoint sets S i of minimal vectors of Λ 24 with the same property. Cohn, Jiao, Kumar, and Torquato proved that these subsets give kissing configurations in dimensions 25-31 of given size linear in the sizes of … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also our hope that the methods in this section (in particular, the application of the Christoffel-Darboux formula to produce positive auxiliary functions) will inspire new analytic approaches to the conformal bootstrap. The implied kissing number in high dimensions, compared with the record kissing number [21,71] and the excluded volume lower bound for the kissing number from [72].…”
Section: Spherical Codes and Implied Kissing Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also our hope that the methods in this section (in particular, the application of the Christoffel-Darboux formula to produce positive auxiliary functions) will inspire new analytic approaches to the conformal bootstrap. The implied kissing number in high dimensions, compared with the record kissing number [21,71] and the excluded volume lower bound for the kissing number from [72].…”
Section: Spherical Codes and Implied Kissing Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5.2:The implied kissing number in high dimensions, compared with the record kissing number[21,71] and the excluded volume lower bound for the kissing number from[72].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%