Abstract:Study design: Prospective comparative study. Objective: To determine whether control of upper limb joint synergy during unrestrained arm raising involving shoulder and elbow flexion is modified by deltoid-to-triceps transfer. Setting: Rehabilitation unit for spinal cord injury patients, France. Methods: Five C6 subjects with C5-C6 tetraplegia sustained posterior deltoid-to-triceps transfer and were compared to a control group of 11 subjects. Kinematics of shoulder and elbow joints before, 6 month and 1 year af… Show more
“…Generalised analysis across groups seems to mask the individuality of patients' responses and adaptation to surgery. As this study established the workspace in which tetraplegic patients can reach and the ability of tetraplegics to reach to this workspace, this study coupled with data from functional tasks 9 and movement control 6 has provided a greater understanding of the functional benefits of the tendon transfer. Future studies using EMG within the workspace would allow researchers to examine how the central nervous system adapts to the tendon transfer and activates the upper-limb muscles to reach effectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reaches at these heights should be considered when undertaking assessment of tetraplegic participants clinically or experimentally in the future. Remy-Neris et al 9 showed the improvement in co-ordination shown by post-tendon transfer tetraplegics during two arm raising tasks. After 16 months, the tetraplegic participants in their study had comparable range of motion and angular velocity to healthy control participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Previous studies suggest that after tendon transfer tetraplegics can co-ordinate their arms similarly to healthy individuals but this has only been shown during two functional tasks 9 or toward targets placed on a table. 6,7 Analysis of reaching within an individual's 3D workspace would allow tetraplegic patients' unconstrained reaching ability to be fully and objectively evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Although such tasks provide insight into altered movement control strategies and functional capabilities, the change in reachable workspace is unknown. Reachable workspace describes the volume within which an individual can reach and it is important in the objective assessment and rehabilitation of patients with upper-limb pathology.…”
Study design: Cross-sectional study. Objectives: To quantify three-dimensional (3D) reachable workspace in different groups of tetraplegic participants and to assess their reaching performance within this workspace. Setting: Northwest Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, UK. Methods: The 3D reachable workspace of three groups of tetraplegics (NON-OP, operated group (OP) and tetraplegic control group (CON Tetraplegic ) with varying levels of triceps function together with a healthy control group (CON Healthy )) was defined by reaching to five target positions (anterior, medial, lateral, superior and inferior) located on the periphery of their workspace. Joint angles and inter-joint coordination were analysed after a 3D reconstruction of the thorax, humerus and forearm. The performance related variables of movement time, peak velocity, time-to-peak velocity and curvature index were also examined. Results: The reachable volumes covered were consistent with the level of triceps function as CON Healthy covered a significantly greater volume than the tetraplegic groups and in turn the OP covered a larger workspace volume than NON-OP. The reduced workspace of tetraplegics was identified as being due to restrictions in workspace above shoulder height and across the body. Coordination data identified some differences in movement patterns but when reaching to targets on the workspace there were no significant differences between the OP and NON-OP groups. Conclusion: This study provided a detailed assessment of reachable workspace and target reaching. Tetraplegic participants found the superior and medial parts of the workspace were the most challenging directions. Standardised biomechanical analysis of tetraplegic upper-limb function is required for objective assessment.
“…Generalised analysis across groups seems to mask the individuality of patients' responses and adaptation to surgery. As this study established the workspace in which tetraplegic patients can reach and the ability of tetraplegics to reach to this workspace, this study coupled with data from functional tasks 9 and movement control 6 has provided a greater understanding of the functional benefits of the tendon transfer. Future studies using EMG within the workspace would allow researchers to examine how the central nervous system adapts to the tendon transfer and activates the upper-limb muscles to reach effectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reaches at these heights should be considered when undertaking assessment of tetraplegic participants clinically or experimentally in the future. Remy-Neris et al 9 showed the improvement in co-ordination shown by post-tendon transfer tetraplegics during two arm raising tasks. After 16 months, the tetraplegic participants in their study had comparable range of motion and angular velocity to healthy control participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Previous studies suggest that after tendon transfer tetraplegics can co-ordinate their arms similarly to healthy individuals but this has only been shown during two functional tasks 9 or toward targets placed on a table. 6,7 Analysis of reaching within an individual's 3D workspace would allow tetraplegic patients' unconstrained reaching ability to be fully and objectively evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Although such tasks provide insight into altered movement control strategies and functional capabilities, the change in reachable workspace is unknown. Reachable workspace describes the volume within which an individual can reach and it is important in the objective assessment and rehabilitation of patients with upper-limb pathology.…”
Study design: Cross-sectional study. Objectives: To quantify three-dimensional (3D) reachable workspace in different groups of tetraplegic participants and to assess their reaching performance within this workspace. Setting: Northwest Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, UK. Methods: The 3D reachable workspace of three groups of tetraplegics (NON-OP, operated group (OP) and tetraplegic control group (CON Tetraplegic ) with varying levels of triceps function together with a healthy control group (CON Healthy )) was defined by reaching to five target positions (anterior, medial, lateral, superior and inferior) located on the periphery of their workspace. Joint angles and inter-joint coordination were analysed after a 3D reconstruction of the thorax, humerus and forearm. The performance related variables of movement time, peak velocity, time-to-peak velocity and curvature index were also examined. Results: The reachable volumes covered were consistent with the level of triceps function as CON Healthy covered a significantly greater volume than the tetraplegic groups and in turn the OP covered a larger workspace volume than NON-OP. The reduced workspace of tetraplegics was identified as being due to restrictions in workspace above shoulder height and across the body. Coordination data identified some differences in movement patterns but when reaching to targets on the workspace there were no significant differences between the OP and NON-OP groups. Conclusion: This study provided a detailed assessment of reachable workspace and target reaching. Tetraplegic participants found the superior and medial parts of the workspace were the most challenging directions. Standardised biomechanical analysis of tetraplegic upper-limb function is required for objective assessment.
“…These results corroborate clinical observations of the functional benefits of surgical restoration of active elbow extension by musculo-tendinous transfer. 8,13,24,30 Current hypotheses concerning the benefit of the presence of an active elbow extensor include the ability to maintain a stable arm posture, especially when the hand is raised above the shoulder level, as is the case in the present task, 31 the ability to interact with a variety of external objects and forces, 32 or the ability to propulse a manual wheelchair. In addition, our results suggest that the presence of a non-paralysed triceps, or of a surgically transferred muscle, facilitates prehension, probably by stabilisation of the elbow during the transport of the objects.…”
Section: Importance and Function Of An Active Elbow Extensormentioning
Study design: Prospective control cohort study. Objectives: To develop a new test to analyse qualitatively grasping strategies in C6/C7 tetraplegic patients, and to quantify the effect of musculo-tendinous transfers. Setting: France. Methods: Twelve C6/C7 tetraplegic adults (17 arms; 31.377.9 years) and 17 healthy subjects (30.979.4 years) completed the study. We assessed participants' ability to grasp, move and release standardized balls of variable sizes and weights. Outcome measures: Failures, movement duration (MD), grip patterns, forearm orientation during transport. Results: In patients as well as in controls, the number of digits involved in prehension increased proportionally to the size and weight of the ball. C6 non-operated tetraplegic patients failed 38.2% of the tasks. They frequently used supine transport (51.4% of successful tasks). MD was longer, with a large distribution of values. The presence of active elbow extension poorly influenced the amount of failure nor grip configuration, but significantly reduced MD and supine transport (34%). Patients who were evaluated after hand surgery showed a trend towards improved MD and more frequent completion (failure 30%), especially for middle-sized and middle-weighted balls. Grip patterns were deeply modified, and all transports were made in pronation. Conclusion: The 'Tetra Ball Test' evidences the characteristics of grasping in tetraplegic patients and those influenced by surgery. It may be useful in understanding effects of surgical procedures. This preliminary study must be completed to evaluate the quantitative responsiveness and reproducibility of this test and to develop instrumented electronic balls to optimise it.
Cervical spinal lesions at C6 result in paralysis of the triceps brachii while leaving deltoid and elbow flexor function intact. We examined the spatial-temporal characteristics of goal-directed aiming movements performed by C6 tetraplegics who had undergone musculotendinous transfer surgery in which the posterior deltoid replaces the triceps as the elbow extensor. On some trials, liquid crystal goggles were used to eliminate vision of the limb and target upon movement initiation. Although tetraplegic participants achieved the same degree of movement accuracy/consistency as control participants, their movement times were longer regardless of whether the movements were made away from (elbow extension) or towards the body (elbow flexion). Longer movement times were related to lower peak velocities, and not the symmetry of the aiming profiles. The tetraplegic participants were no more dependent on visual feedback for limb regulation than control participants. Although the characteristics of the movement trajectories were surprisingly similar, in both vision conditions, tetraplegics required more real and proportional time to reduce spatial variability in the limb's trajectory for elbow extensions. Our results indicate that the sensorimotor system is adaptable and that the representations governing limb control are not muscle specific.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.