2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.90.054320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Jänecke mass formula

Abstract: In this paper we improve an empirical mass formula constructed by Jänecke and collaborators. This formula is enlightened by the Garvey-Kelson mass relations. The new version of the Jänecke formula reproduces 2275 atomic masses with neutron number N 10 and proton number Z 6, at an average accuracy of 128 keV, by employing 576 parameters. The predictive power of our formula is exemplified by comparison with predicted results of other mass models.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(151 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that BLP stands for Breuer, Laine, and Piilo, who were the first to use distinguishability as a measure of non-Markovianity [6]. In a similar way, we find that a large class of system-ancilla quantifiers considered so far [12][13][14] also correspond to PQ of the form I n SA , for different values of n. In particular, I 2 S and I 1 SA corresponds to a large number of cases in the literature (see Table I). Refer to Appendix A, for a detailed disposition of how each quantifier corresponds to PQ.…”
Section: Generalized Formalism For Information Backflowsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Note that BLP stands for Breuer, Laine, and Piilo, who were the first to use distinguishability as a measure of non-Markovianity [6]. In a similar way, we find that a large class of system-ancilla quantifiers considered so far [12][13][14] also correspond to PQ of the form I n SA , for different values of n. In particular, I 2 S and I 1 SA corresponds to a large number of cases in the literature (see Table I). Refer to Appendix A, for a detailed disposition of how each quantifier corresponds to PQ.…”
Section: Generalized Formalism For Information Backflowsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…We now present a generalized formalism for the IB category in such a way that a large class of IB prescriptions proposed so far [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] falls into it. We identify an essential feature which is common to all quantifiers considered in the literature i.e.…”
Section: Generalized Formalism For Information Backflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among the most significant ones, let us mention those based on the deviation of the dynamical maps from divisible CPTP maps (41,42) and those based on channel capacities (43), the nonmonotonicity of the trace distance or distinguishability (44), entanglement (41), and quantum mutual information (45). Other significant works to quantify the non-Markovianity include the flow of QFI (46), volume of Gaussian states (47), local quantum uncertainty (48), and coherence (49,50). Moreover, in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%