2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.08.108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved influenza vaccination in the skin using vaccine coated microneedles

Abstract: Easy and effective vaccination methods could reduce mortality and morbidity due to vaccinepreventable influenza infections. In this study, we examined the use of microneedle patches to increase patient coverage through possible self administration and enhance vaccine immunogenicity by targeted delivery to skin. We carried out a detailed study of protective immune responses after a single influenza vaccination to the skin of mice with a novel microneedle patch designed to facilitate simple and reliable vaccine … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
73
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy that in comparison to our previous work with subcutaneous vaccination, the MN immunization with the trimeric HA induced similar serum IgG and HAI titers and induced the same level of protection against lethal challenge as that in the s.c. vaccinated mice. Comparisons between intramuscular, intranasal, subcutaneous, and microneedle vaccinations using virus-like particles (VLP) and inactivated virus antigens have all demonstrated the enhanced immunogenicity of the transdermal route (16,17,23). Taken together, the results emphasize the conclusion that the delivery route as well as the nature of the vaccine antigen is important in determining the efficacy of an influenza vaccine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It is noteworthy that in comparison to our previous work with subcutaneous vaccination, the MN immunization with the trimeric HA induced similar serum IgG and HAI titers and induced the same level of protection against lethal challenge as that in the s.c. vaccinated mice. Comparisons between intramuscular, intranasal, subcutaneous, and microneedle vaccinations using virus-like particles (VLP) and inactivated virus antigens have all demonstrated the enhanced immunogenicity of the transdermal route (16,17,23). Taken together, the results emphasize the conclusion that the delivery route as well as the nature of the vaccine antigen is important in determining the efficacy of an influenza vaccine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In contrast, microneedles inherently target delivery to the skin using a simple device, which can ultimately lead to local effects on depositing vaccines within the skin and systemic effects on transferring vaccines to the draining lymph nodes through the vasculature or lymphatics after uptake by antigen presenting cells such as dendritic and/or Langerhans cells. Animal studies have shown that microneedles coated with inactivated influenza vaccine can generate stronger humoral and cellular immune responses than intramuscular vaccination (25,26). Microneedles have also been shown to be painless and well tolerated in humans subjects (27)(28)(29).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Sullivan et al and Kim et al reported that administration of influenza vaccine using microneedles could elicit stronger immune responses than those of intramuscular injections in mice without adjuvant substances. 45,46) Moreover, it is important to ensure the safety of vaccine adjuvant in addition to vaccine efficacy after administration. Recently, it has been reported that some adjuvant substances provoked critical adverse effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%