2002
DOI: 10.1002/jms.288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved in‐gel approaches to generate peptide maps of integral membrane proteins with matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry

Abstract: Improved in-gel approaches to generate peptide maps of integral membrane proteins with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry van Montfort, B.A.; Canas, B.; Duurkens, R.H.T.; Godovac-Zimmermann, J.; Robillard, G.T. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): htt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sample aliquots were cocrystallized with the matrix on the MALDI-TOF sample plate at various dilutions, and the dried residues were washed twice with cold 0.1% aqueous trifluoroacetic acid to remove salts and residual glutaraldehyde. A volume of 0.5 l of 0.1% aqueous octylglucoside was added to each residue, followed by evaporation under ambient laboratory conditions (46), as this was found to improve the mass spectra.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample aliquots were cocrystallized with the matrix on the MALDI-TOF sample plate at various dilutions, and the dried residues were washed twice with cold 0.1% aqueous trifluoroacetic acid to remove salts and residual glutaraldehyde. A volume of 0.5 l of 0.1% aqueous octylglucoside was added to each residue, followed by evaporation under ambient laboratory conditions (46), as this was found to improve the mass spectra.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spots then were washed and digested with modified trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI) (Shevchenko et al, 1996) or pepsin, and peptides extracted automatically using the ProGest robot (Genomic Solutions). The acetone-soluble proteins were digested with trypsin and chymotrypsin or cleaved by limited acid hydrolysis (Shevchenko et al, 2000) or CnBr (van Montfort et al, 2002). Fractions from off-line RP-HPLC were digested in-solution with pepsin (in 70% formic acid and 1 mM HCl), trypsin (in 8 M urea), or chymotrypsin (in 8 M urea).…”
Section: Ms Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two other labeled proteins of ca. 20 and 55 kDa were observed but could not be identified by MS. Possible reasons for the inability to identify these proteins include resistance to trypsin digestion (7,40), the mass-altering effect of biotinylation, or the presence of unknown posttranslational modifications, resulting in a failure to derive peptide mass matches. However, the 20-kDa protein demonstrated a significant degree of surface labeling and may therefore represent an additional as-yet-uncharacterized, surface-exposed protein.…”
Section: Vol 73 2005mentioning
confidence: 99%