2018
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2018.2800060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Hourly Estimates of Aerosol Optical Thickness Using Spatiotemporal Variability Derived From Himawari-8 Geostationary Satellite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome temporal resolution limitations, there were several attempts to retrieve AOD using first-generation meteorological geostationary satellites such as the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES), the Geostationary Meteorological Satellite (GMS), and the Multifunction Transport Satellite (MTSAT), but they showed worse accuracy than those of LEO sensors due to the wider and fewer visible channels with coarser spatial resolution, which make it difficult to distinguish aerosol types (Kim et al, 2008;Knapp et al, 2002;Urm and Sohn, 2005;Wang et al, 2003;Yoon et al, 2007). As the specifications of recently launched geostationary Earth orbit (GEO) sensors, such as the Geostationary Ocean Color Imager (GOCI) and the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI) over East Asia and the Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) over the United States, are approaching those of current LEO sensors, aerosol optical properties can be retrieved with an accuracy as high as that of LEO sensors, and at much higher temporal resolutions, from a few minutes to an hour during daylight hours (Chen et al, 2018;Choi et al, 2016Choi et al, , 2018Daisaku, 2016;Kikuchi et al, 2018;Lee et al, 2010;Lim et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2018). This breakthrough in temporal resolution of GEO aerosol data enables us to monitor highly variable aerosol conditions and improve air quality forecasting, particularly for PM, with data assimilation (Jeon et al, 2016;Lee et al, 2016;Pang et al, 2018;Park et al, 2014;Saide et al, 2014) or machine learning (Park et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome temporal resolution limitations, there were several attempts to retrieve AOD using first-generation meteorological geostationary satellites such as the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES), the Geostationary Meteorological Satellite (GMS), and the Multifunction Transport Satellite (MTSAT), but they showed worse accuracy than those of LEO sensors due to the wider and fewer visible channels with coarser spatial resolution, which make it difficult to distinguish aerosol types (Kim et al, 2008;Knapp et al, 2002;Urm and Sohn, 2005;Wang et al, 2003;Yoon et al, 2007). As the specifications of recently launched geostationary Earth orbit (GEO) sensors, such as the Geostationary Ocean Color Imager (GOCI) and the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI) over East Asia and the Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) over the United States, are approaching those of current LEO sensors, aerosol optical properties can be retrieved with an accuracy as high as that of LEO sensors, and at much higher temporal resolutions, from a few minutes to an hour during daylight hours (Chen et al, 2018;Choi et al, 2016Choi et al, , 2018Daisaku, 2016;Kikuchi et al, 2018;Lee et al, 2010;Lim et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2018). This breakthrough in temporal resolution of GEO aerosol data enables us to monitor highly variable aerosol conditions and improve air quality forecasting, particularly for PM, with data assimilation (Jeon et al, 2016;Lee et al, 2016;Pang et al, 2018;Park et al, 2014;Saide et al, 2014) or machine learning (Park et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we focus on assimilating the latest version of the Himawari‐8 Level 3 hourly merged AOTs at 500 nm (Kikuchi et al, ). This data set contains as many AOT retrievals as possible with a horizontal resolution of 0.05° × 0.05°, which are derived from a set of AOTs with strict cloud screening within the preceding 1 hr.…”
Section: Observational Data and Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this preprocessing, we aggregate the original Himawari‐8 gridded AOTs to a model horizontal resolution of 2° × 2° using the mean value of all the data points in the aggregation cell and assign a missing value for the grid where the number of effective Himawari‐8 observations is less than 320, which represents 20% of the maximum possible number of 0.05° × 0.05° Himawari‐8 observations in a 2° × 2° grid. The threshold value of 20% is applied to avoid representing coarse grid values with limited observations filled only within a portion of the coarse grid (Kikuchi et al, ; Schutgens et al, ). The gridded total observation error variances ( σo2) are estimated as the sum of the instrumental error variance ( σi2) and sample error variance ( σs2), or the so‐called spatial representative error variance (Zhang et al, ).…”
Section: Observational Data and Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, satellite AOD products are defined at relatively coarse spatial resolution. For example, AOD products have been developed using data from Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) at 1 • resolution [14], Polarization and Directionality of Earth Reflectances (POLDER) at 1/6 • resolution [15], Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) at 17.6 km resolution [16], Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MERIS) at 10 km resolution [17], Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) at 6 km resolution [18], Himawari-8 Geostationary at 0.05 • resolution [19], and MODIS at 10 km, 3 km [9,20] and 1 km resolution [21]. Coarse resolution products are less suitable for studying aerosols in urban environments where aerosol distributions may change at finer spatial scales due to factors including spatial variations in building and transport infrastructure and human population densities [22][23][24].The recently launched Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 satellites can be used to derive AOD data at 30 m and 10 m resolution respectively and so have the potential for urban aerosol monitoring.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%