2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20247239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved GNSS Localization and Byzantine Detection in UAV Swarms

Abstract: Many tasks performed by swarms of unmanned aerial vehicles require localization. In many cases, the sensors that take part in the localization process suffer from inherent measurement errors. This problem is amplified when disruptions are added, either endogenously through Byzantine failures of agents within the swarm, or exogenously by some external source, such as a GNSS jammer. In this paper, we first introduce an improved localization method based on distance observation. Then, we devise schemes for detect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hacohen et al [76] proposed a GNSS spoofing detection mechanism in UAV swarms that leverage the IMUs and the GNSS (GPS) receivers. Additionally, an onboard sensor that estimates the relative distance between the drones (like LoRa Sensor) is employed in this scheme.…”
Section: B Gps Spoofing Defense Mechanisms In Uavsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hacohen et al [76] proposed a GNSS spoofing detection mechanism in UAV swarms that leverage the IMUs and the GNSS (GPS) receivers. Additionally, an onboard sensor that estimates the relative distance between the drones (like LoRa Sensor) is employed in this scheme.…”
Section: B Gps Spoofing Defense Mechanisms In Uavsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of Accuracy, signal processing-based methods [85], [87] also show relatively high results of 98.4% and 96.2%, respectively. The methods that rely on onboard sensors such as [66] and [76] showcased greater Accuracy of 97% and 90%, respectively. The methods that rely on signal processing and onboard sensors were efficient in terms of detection time (latency) as well, which was less than two seconds in [81].…”
Section: E Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Byzantine fault tolerance has received significant attention in distributed machine learning research, its application to mitigate Byzantine attacks in multi-UAV systems has been limited to only a few works [28][29][30][31][32][33]. Its practical implementation in real-world scenarios has been relatively unexplored in the literature.…”
Section: Byzantine Fault Tolerance In Multi-uav Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GNSS traffic estimation allows for real-time, efficient, wideregion, and inexpensive use of a stand-alone device [24]. However, GNSS errors are caused by multipath and NLOS (non-line-of-sight) effects, which become severe in urban areas [25]. In particular, GNSS pseudorange positioning is not accurate enough for lanelevel bus tracking [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%