2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-20465-4_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Generic Algorithms for Hard Knapsacks

Abstract: Abstract. At Eurocrypt 2010, Howgrave-Graham and Joux described an algorithm for solving hard knapsacks of density close to 1 in timeÕ(2 0.337n ) and memoryÕ(2 0.256n ), thereby improving a 30-year old algorithm by Shamir and Schroeppel. In this paper we extend the Howgrave-GrahamJoux technique to get an algorithm with running time down toÕ(2 0.291n ). An implementation shows the practicability of the technique. Another challenge is to reduce the memory requirement. We describe a constant memory algorithm base… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
161
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
161
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also a meet-in-the-middle attack that requiresÕ(3 n/2 ) (respectively,Õ(2 n/2 )) space and time. One can also convert to ISIS and apply algorithms due to Howgrave-Graham and Joux [13] and Becker, Coron and Joux [5]. All such attacks can be defeated by taking n ≥ 200 (the storage requirement is a serious constraint).…”
Section: Binary Lwe and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also a meet-in-the-middle attack that requiresÕ(3 n/2 ) (respectively,Õ(2 n/2 )) space and time. One can also convert to ISIS and apply algorithms due to Howgrave-Graham and Joux [13] and Becker, Coron and Joux [5]. All such attacks can be defeated by taking n ≥ 200 (the storage requirement is a serious constraint).…”
Section: Binary Lwe and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three decades later, Howgrave-Graham and Joux in [17, eprint version, Section 3.1] described the left-right split with a modulus as a "useful practical variant" of the Schroeppel-Shamir algorithm; Becker, Coron, and Joux stated in [3] that this was a "simpler but heuristic variant of Schroeppel-Shamir". A more general algorithm (with one minor restriction, namely a prime choice of modulus) had already been stated a few years earlier by Elsenhans and Jahnel; see [10, Section 4.2.1] and [11, page 2].…”
Section: Modulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Howgrave-Graham and Joux introduced this technique in [17] and obtained a subset-sum algorithm that costs just 2 (0.337...+o(1))n . Beware that [17] incorrectly claimed a cost of 2 (0.311...+o(1))n ; the underlying flaw in the analysis was corrected in [3] with credit to May and Meurer.…”
Section: Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations