2015
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201500262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved General Understanding of the Hydrogen‐Bonding Phenomena: A Reply

Abstract: chemical bonds · electrostatic interactions · hydrogen-bonded complexes · hydrogen bonds · quantum-chemical calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured and calculated IR redshifts of the cationic and propanol clusters are nearly similar. This finding strongly supports the covalent character of H‐bonding and the concept of “anti‐electrostatic hydrogen bonds” (AEHB) as controversially discussed recently . There is also some indication that the formation of these clusters allows to supercool the IL and prevent it from crystallization.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The measured and calculated IR redshifts of the cationic and propanol clusters are nearly similar. This finding strongly supports the covalent character of H‐bonding and the concept of “anti‐electrostatic hydrogen bonds” (AEHB) as controversially discussed recently . There is also some indication that the formation of these clusters allows to supercool the IL and prevent it from crystallization.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Moreover, the considerable covalent nature of “AEHB” was ascribed to a strong n D →σ* H‐A CT interaction, based on natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis . This novel proposal of AEHB instantly stimulated heated discussions . The exemplary [F – ···HCO 3 ] 2– dianion was re‐examined by Frenking and Caramori, who proved the Coulombic force as the secondary significant stabilizing factor, despite the dominating orbital interaction .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32,33] This novel proposal of AEHB instantly stimulated heated discussions. [34,35] The exemplary [F -ÁÁÁHCO 3 ] 2dianion was re-examined by Frenking and Caramori, who proved the Coulombic force as the secondary significant stabilizing factor, despite the dominating orbital interaction. [34] Since any unusual and controversial idea is also beguiling, we were prompted to carry out a more detailed investigation of the compatibility of AEHB with the conventional theory on H-bonding and furthermore on halogen bonding (X-bonding).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, Coulomb repulsion of the anions can be compensated by hydrogen-bonding interactions, allowing protonated anions to form dimers or larger aggregates in which every individual component is negatively charged. While there recently has been controversy in the literature about the exact nature of the underlying interactions, 5 such aggregates are generally believed to be stabilised by attractive electrostatic interactions in the hydrogen bond that balance electrostatic repulsion. 6 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%