2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved frozen section examination of the retroareolar margin for prediction of nipple involvement in breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A study on imprint cytological assessment of the subareolar tissue showed that it might not be sufficient as an exclusive method for the intraoperative assessment of the NAC, having the sensitivity of 50% and the specificity of 87.58% [ 36 ]. The intraoperative assessment of NAC by frozen sections is more sensitive (92%), but to obtain reliable results it is needed to use specific diagnostic protocols [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study on imprint cytological assessment of the subareolar tissue showed that it might not be sufficient as an exclusive method for the intraoperative assessment of the NAC, having the sensitivity of 50% and the specificity of 87.58% [ 36 ]. The intraoperative assessment of NAC by frozen sections is more sensitive (92%), but to obtain reliable results it is needed to use specific diagnostic protocols [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies involving expressive cohorts showed that the subareolar frozen-section examination could yield false-negative rates between 1.3% and 9.3% [1,[20][21][22]. Even with the very favorable results shown with this technique, its use is limited because of the complexity of the method involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the distance of tumor to nipple has been shown to correlate with likelihood of nipple involvement, some patients with tumors close to but not involving the nipple are now being offered this procedure (175). There is also controversy as to whether intraoperative evaluation can accurately identify nipple involvement for which further surgery is warranted, or whether permanent pathology is most accurate (176). Nipple involvement with malignancy (DCIS, invasive ductal cancer, invasive lobular cancer) should be treated with excision.…”
Section: Expanding Indications For Nipple-sparing Mastectomymentioning
confidence: 99%