2009
DOI: 10.2144/000113246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Forensic DNA Analysis Through the use of Alternative DNA Polymerases and Statistical Modeling of DNA Profiles

Abstract: DNA evidence, linking perpetrators to crime scenes, is central to many legal proceedings. However, DNA samples from crime scenes often contain PCR-inhibitory substances, which may generate blank or incomplete DNA profiles. Extensive DNA purification can be required to rid the sample of these inhibitors, although these procedures increase the risk of DNA loss. Most forensic laboratories use commercial DNA amplification kits (e.g., AmpFlSTR SGM Plus) with the DNA polymerase AmpliTaq Gold as the gold standard. He… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Quantifiler kit includes an internal PCR control (IPC) for estimation of PCR inhibition. However, the IPC only flagged for inhibition in 14 of the 42 crime scene stains that were clearly inhibited in standard AmpFlSTR SGM Plus analysis (results not shown), strengthening the notion that the multiplex STR analysis is more sensitive to inhibitors than the Quantifiler assay [6].…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The Quantifiler kit includes an internal PCR control (IPC) for estimation of PCR inhibition. However, the IPC only flagged for inhibition in 14 of the 42 crime scene stains that were clearly inhibited in standard AmpFlSTR SGM Plus analysis (results not shown), strengthening the notion that the multiplex STR analysis is more sensitive to inhibitors than the Quantifiler assay [6].…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The previously described forensic DNA profile index (FI) [6,21] was used to quantify the quality differences between DNA profiles generated by the different DNA polymerase-buffer systems. In short, the FI uses principal components analysis to create one single value describing the quality of an electropherogram/DNA profile based on three measures: (i) the total peak height (TPH) of the CE electropherogram, that is, the sum of the heights of all true allelic STR peaks observed in a DNA profile given in relative fluorescence units (RFU); (ii) the mean local balance (MLB, intralocus balance), that is, the mean of ratios between the two peaks within each heterozygous STR locus in an electropherogram; and (iii) the Shannon entropy (SH, interloci balance), that is, discrepancies between the sums of the peak heights of the different STR markers in an electropherogram.…”
Section: Multiplex Str Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations