2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2023.113928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved family-wise error rate control in multiple equivalence testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FWER is the probability of one or more type I errors occurring in a family of tests under the null hypothesis, and the FDR is the expected proportion of the ratio: number of false-positive tests to the number of tests with the null hypothesis rejected [47]. There are a variety of methods for controlling FWER (Bonferroni, Holm, Hochberg, Hommel, and adaptive Bonferroni) and FDR (two-stage linear set-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger and Yekutieli, Benjamini and Hochberg, and Storey Tibshirani) [48][49][50]. The most representative methods for FWER and FDR are Bonferroni and Benjamini-Hochberg, respectively.…”
Section: Normality Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The FWER is the probability of one or more type I errors occurring in a family of tests under the null hypothesis, and the FDR is the expected proportion of the ratio: number of false-positive tests to the number of tests with the null hypothesis rejected [47]. There are a variety of methods for controlling FWER (Bonferroni, Holm, Hochberg, Hommel, and adaptive Bonferroni) and FDR (two-stage linear set-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger and Yekutieli, Benjamini and Hochberg, and Storey Tibshirani) [48][49][50]. The most representative methods for FWER and FDR are Bonferroni and Benjamini-Hochberg, respectively.…”
Section: Normality Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FWER is the probability of one or more type I errors occurring in a family of tests under the null hypothesis, and the FDR is the expected proportion of the ratio: number of falsepositive tests to the number of tests with the null hypothesis rejected [47]. There are a variety of methods for controlling FWER (Bonferroni, Holm, Hochberg, Hommel, and adaptive Bonferroni) and FDR (two-stage linear set-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger and Yekutieli, Benjamini and Hochberg, and Storey Tibshirani) [48][49][50]. The most representative methods for FWER and FDR are Bonferroni and Benjamini-Hochberg, BH correction method: Sorting the p-values in ascending order, ranking the p-values (the smallest p-value has rank 1), calculating the critical BH value for each p-value using the formula (i/m)Q, where i is the rank of a particular p-value, m is the total number of tests, and Q is the false discovery rate chosen by the user.…”
Section: Normality Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%