The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1002/2013jg002456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved estimations of gross primary production using satellite-derived photosynthetically active radiation

Abstract: Terrestrial vegetation gross primary production (GPP) is an important variable in determining the global carbon cycle as well as the interannual variability of the atmospheric CO 2 concentration. The accuracy of GPP simulation is substantially affected by several critical model drivers, one of the most important of which is photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) which directly determines the photosynthesis processes of plants. In this study, we examined the impacts of uncertainties in radiation products on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(104 reference statements)
0
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The MERRA PAR product has been successfully used to investigate biogeochemical aspects of various ecosystems (Yuan et al 2011;Cai et al 2014;Sindelarova et al 2014;Yue et al 2015). Additionally, we compared it with observational PAR obtained by the SeaWiFS satellite from 1998 to 2001 for all 37 polynyas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MERRA PAR product has been successfully used to investigate biogeochemical aspects of various ecosystems (Yuan et al 2011;Cai et al 2014;Sindelarova et al 2014;Yue et al 2015). Additionally, we compared it with observational PAR obtained by the SeaWiFS satellite from 1998 to 2001 for all 37 polynyas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation in these results may be the result of differences among model structures [6]. In addition, the different sources and spatial resolutions of the input climate data used in the different models may also underlie this variation [51].…”
Section: Reliability and Merits Of The Swh Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainties may also be incurred by the inaccurate estimate of light-use efficiency. Many efforts have been made to solve this issue, such as improving drought constraint [51], accounting for diffusive radiation [57,58] and updating the empirical values in the equations of environmental constraints (e.g., T min , T opt , T max , VPD max ) in the GPP model [31]. Therefore, improving GPP estimation would be anticipated with the outcome of these efforts, which thus will be a benefit for improving ET modeling with the SWH model.…”
Section: Uncertainties Of the Swh Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, the VPM model only needs calibration for the maximum LUE or it can be acquired from existing publications; it is therefore more suitable to upscale simulations at various spatial and temporal domains. Satellite-derived PAR data from high spatial resolution GLASS images have been proven effective in GPP simulations (Cai et al, 2014), and the VPM model can also use LST data to replace air temperature data, which can help to reduce the dependence of the model on meteorological measurements and make VPM an independent, satellite-driven, and more operational model.…”
Section: Trade-off Between Comprehensiveness and Applicability In Satmentioning
confidence: 99%