2012
DOI: 10.1109/tcsvt.2011.2171262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Estimation of Transmission Distortion for Error-Resilient Video Coding

Abstract: Abstract-This paper presents an improved technique for estimating the end-to-end distortion, which includes both quantization error after encoding and random transmission error, after transmission in video communication systems. The proposed technique mainly differs from most existing techniques in that it takes into account filtering operations, e.g. interpolation in subpixel motion compensation, as introduced in advanced video codecs. The distortion estimation for pixels or subpixels under filtering operatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, as a consequence of propagated channel error, certain pixel values at the decoder could exceed their nominal range (i.e., for 8 bit precise videos, nominal range of pixels values are between 0 and 255) in which case the decoder performs a clipping operation to retain them within the nominal range. This behavior had not been foreseen by the previous quality prediction methods and was incorporated in the algorithm proposed in [5]. However, the applicability of these algorithms in the context of HEVC is limited due to the fact that these methods do not possess the intelligence to capture the error propagation behavior introduced by the novel components of HEVC such as AMVP.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as a consequence of propagated channel error, certain pixel values at the decoder could exceed their nominal range (i.e., for 8 bit precise videos, nominal range of pixels values are between 0 and 255) in which case the decoder performs a clipping operation to retain them within the nominal range. This behavior had not been foreseen by the previous quality prediction methods and was incorporated in the algorithm proposed in [5]. However, the applicability of these algorithms in the context of HEVC is limited due to the fact that these methods do not possess the intelligence to capture the error propagation behavior introduced by the novel components of HEVC such as AMVP.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…))] 2 , (8) where N sb is the number of the subcarrier, γ j is the SINR at the j th subcarrier, and κ(m) is the calibration factor for the MCS mode m. The functions J(x) and J −1 (y) are defined as (9) and (10). Based on the MIESM γ mief f (m), the BLER BLER(r mief f (m)) for the RB with the MCS mode m can be accurately predicted as [15] BLER(γ mief f (m)) =…”
Section: Proposed Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7], the Recursive Optimal Per-pixel Estimation (ROPE) was utilized to estimate the end-to-end distortion, which assisted RDO to determine the optimal encoding modes in the error-prone transmission environment. To improve the decoding distortion estimation accuracy, the effect of filtering operation on the accuracy of the distortion estimation was well considered by Chen et al [9]. In our previous work [10], the structural similarity was introduced into the error-resilient RDO process as the distortion metric, and the Lagrange multiplier was correspondingly adjusted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our model the value of ↵ i for inter coded pixels is estimated using the Laplacian function method proposed in [12] wherein the decaying effect of error propagation is attributed to clipping noise. The value that ↵ i can get using this method ranges from 0.5 to 1.…”
Section: End To End Distortion Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%