2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2012.09.017
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Improved estimation of electricity demand function by using of artificial neural network, principal component analysis and data envelopment analysis

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
71
13
3
0

Citation Types

1
49
0
3

Year Published

Range
2013
2013
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
62
11
6
3

Relationship

0
82

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 81 publications

(53 citation statements)
references

References 54 publications

1
49
0
3
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Although, these conclusions sort of diverge from studies that considered both approaches as an alternative (Mousavi et al , 2019; Samoilenko and Osei-Bryson, 2010; Azadeh et al , 2007; Santin et al , 2004; Wang, 2003), as well as distinguishing in the prediction scope of ROA and ROE as the dominant pillars of financial performance. They are consistent with those of similar studies that adopted the DEA-ANN integration to exploit their aforementioned advantages (Tsolas et al , 2020; Shokrollahpour et al , 2016; Kwon and Lee, 2015; Kwon, 2014; Kheirkhah et al , 2013; Azadeh et al , 2011; Çelebi and Bayraktar, 2008; Angelidis and Lyroudi, 2006), which emphasized that banks can rely on DEA-ANN combination to assess and forecast the best financial performance, determine causes of inefficiency and proactive management of performance regardless of the priority of either DEA or ANN usage. The findings have also provided evidence that benefiting from the integrative DEA-ANN capabilities is not restricted to organizations in developed countries.…”
Section: Empirical Analysis and Results
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Neural network performance depends on model-building parameters such as training sequence, number of hidden neurons and learning mechanisms. However, network optimization remains a challenging task for practitioners (Kwon, 2014; Kheirkhah et al , 2013; Emrouznejad and Shale, 2009).…”
Section: Empirical Analysis and Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation