2018
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved enzyme annotation with EC-specific cutoffs using DETECT v2

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first built draft models of all strains using sequence similarity. Following that we added additional metabolic content identified through the use of DETECT v2 (Nursimulu et al, 2018), an enzyme annotation tool. This process allowed us to include additional metabolic processes unique to each of the strains.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first built draft models of all strains using sequence similarity. Following that we added additional metabolic content identified through the use of DETECT v2 (Nursimulu et al, 2018), an enzyme annotation tool. This process allowed us to include additional metabolic processes unique to each of the strains.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EC Number Prediction Tools. Next, DeepEC was compared with the latest versions of 5 representative EC number prediction tools that are locally installable, including CatFam (13), DETECT v2 (19), ECPred (20), EFICAz2.5 (15), and PRIAM (11), with respect to their prediction performances. For a systematic comparison of prediction performances, 201 enzyme protein sequences were used as inputs, which were not used for the development of these 6 different tools; these enzyme protein sequences were obtained from the Swiss-Prot database released on August 2018.…”
Section: Comparison Of Prediction Performance Of Deepec With 5 Represmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As of September 2018, 6,238 fourth-level EC numbers have been defined in the ExPASy database (10). Because of the importance of EC number prediction in understanding enzyme functions, a number of relevant computational methods have been developed: PRIAM (11), EzyPred (12), CatFam (13), EnzML (14), EFICAz2.5 (15), EnzDP (16), SVM-prot (17), DEEPre (18), DETECT v2 (19), and ECPred (20). However, prediction performances of these tools have room for further improvement with respect to computation time, precision, and coverage for the prediction of EC numbers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former two tools rely on a non-redundant database of genome sequences, ChocoPhlAn 26 , while DIAMOND utilizes the NCBI non-redundant (NR) protein database 35 . For enzyme annotation, MetaPro relies on an ensemble approach involving DETECT 36 , PRIAM 37 and DIAMOND 34 searches against the Swiss-Prot database 38 . Due to its greater precision, MetaPro incorporates all DETECT predictions while only incorporating the union of the predictions obtained from both the PRIAM and DIAMOND searches.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of each pipeline to accurately infer enzymatic functions of the datasets is essential for understanding the metabolic activity of a sample. Since annotations based on simple similarity searches can yield false positive rates of up to 50% 53 , MetaPro relies on a robust approach that combines predictions from DETECT 36 , with those from PRIAM 54 that are also confirmed by sequence similarity searches against the Swiss-Prot database 55 . This approach has been shown to significantly outperform sequence similarity searches and has been effectively applied in a number of settings 56-61…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%