Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.07.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved electrochemical performance of Fe-N-C catalysts through ionic liquid modification in alkaline media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
58
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
58
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The pyrolysis step after ball-milling led to an increase in ECSA only for the sample prepared with no ball-milling (146 m 2 g −1 for FeNC_P vs. 19 m 2 g −1 for FeNC) and the sample obtained with 1 h of ball-milling time (69 m 2 g −1 for FeNC_BM1_P vs. 54 m 2 g −1 for FeNC_BM1). By contrast, the pyrolysis treatment led to a decrease in ECSA for ball-milling time higher than 1 h. This can be ascribed to an agglomeration of solid clusters and pore growth between them, as previously reported by Martinaiou et al, who demonstrated that ESCA of Fe-N-C materials is reduced by a pyrolysis step after ball milling due to changes in porosity [60]. Epr and Jpr values were affected by pyrolysis with a similar trend as compared to that described for ECSA and illustrated in Figure 7.…”
Section: Samplesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The pyrolysis step after ball-milling led to an increase in ECSA only for the sample prepared with no ball-milling (146 m 2 g −1 for FeNC_P vs. 19 m 2 g −1 for FeNC) and the sample obtained with 1 h of ball-milling time (69 m 2 g −1 for FeNC_BM1_P vs. 54 m 2 g −1 for FeNC_BM1). By contrast, the pyrolysis treatment led to a decrease in ECSA for ball-milling time higher than 1 h. This can be ascribed to an agglomeration of solid clusters and pore growth between them, as previously reported by Martinaiou et al, who demonstrated that ESCA of Fe-N-C materials is reduced by a pyrolysis step after ball milling due to changes in porosity [60]. Epr and Jpr values were affected by pyrolysis with a similar trend as compared to that described for ECSA and illustrated in Figure 7.…”
Section: Samplesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The G‐band is related to the graphitic carbon with sp 2 electronic configuration, whereas the D ‐band is associated with vibrations at the edges of graphene planes or close to defects . The D 3 ‐band corresponds to the defective carbon including organic molecules, molecular fragments, or functional groups, and the D 4 ‐band is ascribed to polyene‐like structures, according to recently published results . It is believed that the intensity ratio of D 3 ‐band to G‐band (denoted as I D3 / I G ) can serve as a valid descriptor for nitrogen‐containing heteroatoms presented in carbons, and the greater the I D3 / I G , the higher the nitrogen level .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…[21] The D 3 -band corresponds to the defective carboni ncluding organic molecules, molecular fragments,o rf unctionalg roups,a nd the D 4 -band is ascribed to polyene-like structures, accordingt or ecently published results. [22,23] It is believed that the intensity ratio of D 3 -band to Gband (denoted as I D3 /I G )c an serve as av alid descriptor for nitrogen-containing heteroatomsp resentedi nc arbons, and the greater the I D3 /I G ,t he higher the nitrogen level. [21] In our case, the I D3 /I G of the Cu-N-C( 0.50) increases obviously,c ompared with that of the N-C sample (0.25) in Figure 2(d), implying the presence of the CuÀNm oietiesb esides the N-C in the Cu-N-C sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Subsequently, it was reported by Kramm et al that ILs improved the ORR activity of Fe-N/C catalysts in alkaline electrolyte. 24 However, IL modification of transition metal-based ORR catalysts are still rarely reported, especially for Co-N/C based materials. The practical behavior and operational mechanisms of such IL-modified non-PGM catalysts in fuel cells remain unknown, as they have not been rigorously tested in either PEMFCs or AEMFCs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%