2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved effectiveness and efficiency in measuring soil enzymes as universal soil quality indicators using microplate fluorimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Trap et al. () reported that the values of soil enzyme activity obtained by the spectrophotometric method were around eight times higher than those revealed by the fluorimetric method, and Deng et al. () found that results from these two methods were comparable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Trap et al. () reported that the values of soil enzyme activity obtained by the spectrophotometric method were around eight times higher than those revealed by the fluorimetric method, and Deng et al. () found that results from these two methods were comparable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that these two methods can yield inconsistent results. For example, Trap et al (2012) reported that the values of soil enzyme activity obtained by the spectrophotometric method were around eight times higher than those revealed by the fluorimetric method, and Deng et al (2013) found that results from these two methods were comparable. In our case, 31 pairs of soil enzyme activities used the microplate fluorimetric method, and 170 used the spectrophotometric method (Appendix S1: Table S1).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential activities of three C‐acquiring enzymes (β‐1,4‐glucosidase, βG, EC 3.2.1.21; β‐D‐1,4‐cellobiosidase, CBH, EC 3.2.1.91; β‐1,4‐xylosidase, βX, EC 3.2.1.37), two N‐acquiring enzymes (β‐N‐acetyl glucosaminidase, NAG, EC 3.1.6.1; leucine aminopeptidase, LAP, EC 3.4.11.1), and one P‐acquiring enzyme (alkaline phosphatase, AP, EC 3.1.3.2) in the soil samples were measured following a modified fluorescence method (German et al, ; Trap et al, ). In brief, 1 g of fresh soil was homogenized in 125‐ml 2‐morpholin‐4‐ylethanesulfonic acid buffer (pH = 6.5) or 2‐amino‐2‐(hydroxymethyl) propane‐1,3‐diol (Tris) buffer (pH = 7.5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential activities of three C-acquiring enzymes (β- (German et al, 2011;Trap et al, 2012). In brief, 1 g of fresh soil was homogenized in 125-ml 2-morpholin-4-ylethanesulfonic acid buffer (pH = 6.5) or 2-amino-2-(hydroxymethyl) propane-1,3-diol (Tris) buffer (pH = 7.5).…”
Section: Enzyme Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil enzymes mainly belong to hydrolases, oxidoreductases, transferases and lyases (Tabatabai and Dick 2002). Hydrolases are the most commonly measured class of enzymes in soils (Burns et al 2013;Nannipieri et al 2002, Trap et al 2012Riah et al 2014). Enzymes respond to soil management changes before changes in other soil parameters are detectable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%