2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.81.084024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved effective-one-body Hamiltonian for spinning black-hole binaries

Abstract: Building on a recent paper in which we computed the canonical Hamiltonian of a spinning test particle in curved spacetime, at linear order in the particle's spin, we work out an improved effectiveone-body (EOB) Hamiltonian for spinning black-hole binaries. As in previous descriptions, we endow the effective particle not only with a mass µ, but also with a spin S * . Thus, the effective particle interacts with the effective Kerr background (having spin SKerr) through a geodesic-type interaction and an additiona… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
349
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(364 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
15
349
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We provide a detailed evaluation of the source properties and inferred parameters of GW150914, GW151226, and LVT151012. We use models of the waveform covering the inspiral, merger, and ringdown phases based on combining post-Newtonian (PN) theory [19][20][21][22][23][24], the effective-onebody (EOB) formalism [25][26][27][28][29], and numerical relativity simulations [30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. One model is restricted to spins aligned with the orbital angular momentum [8,9], while the other allows for nonaligned orientation of the spins, which can lead to precession of the orbital plane [37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We provide a detailed evaluation of the source properties and inferred parameters of GW150914, GW151226, and LVT151012. We use models of the waveform covering the inspiral, merger, and ringdown phases based on combining post-Newtonian (PN) theory [19][20][21][22][23][24], the effective-onebody (EOB) formalism [25][26][27][28][29], and numerical relativity simulations [30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. One model is restricted to spins aligned with the orbital angular momentum [8,9], while the other allows for nonaligned orientation of the spins, which can lead to precession of the orbital plane [37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytical inspiral-merger-ringdown (IMR) waveform models used in this Letter were developed within two frameworks: (i) the effective-one-body (EOB) formalism [20][21][22][23][24], which combines PN results [10] with NR [25][26][27] and perturbation theory [28][29][30], and (ii) a phenomenological approach [31][32][33][34] based on extending frequencydomain PN expressions and hybridizing PN and EOB with NR waveforms. Specifically, here we adopt the doublespin, nonprecessing waveform model developed in Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EOB conservative dynamics and waveforms have been extended to spinning BHs in [271,[286][287][288][289][290][291] and [292], respectively. In particular, motivated by the construction of a EOB Hamiltonian for spinning systems, that reduces to the Hamiltonian of a spinning particle in the extreme-mass ratio limit, [287] worked out, for the first time, the Hamiltonian of a spinning particle in curved spacetime at all orders in PN theory and linear in the particle's spin.…”
Section: The Effective-one-body Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%