2019 5th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/infoman.2019.8714669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved DV-Hop Algorithm Based on Minimum Hops Correction and Reevaluate Hop Distance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The larger the minimum hop-count value from the localization node to the beacon node, the greater the cumulative error value [ 27 ]. On account of the error is directly proportional to the hop-count value, when the hop-count value is large, the localization result will be inaccurate if the estimated distance with large error is used to calculate the node localization coordinates [ 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger the minimum hop-count value from the localization node to the beacon node, the greater the cumulative error value [ 27 ]. On account of the error is directly proportional to the hop-count value, when the hop-count value is large, the localization result will be inaccurate if the estimated distance with large error is used to calculate the node localization coordinates [ 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the investigation of the equation (26) shows that the ODR is more and more dependent upon R rather thanHop count , which establishes its efficiency to exploit the antenna capabilities of a sensor more than the DV-Hop and IDV, because in DV-Hop and IDV the prominent factor isHop count rather than R . Even the equation (26) shows that the localization error will remain quite low in contrast with DV-Hop and IDV.…”
Section: Analytical Examination Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The equation (26) along with Table 5 exposes the cause behind the reduction in localization error due to the increase in the communication range. Table 5 demonstrates an interesting trend that with the rise in communication range the hop counts start falling.…”
Section: Analytical Examination Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations