2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved diagnosis of melioidosis using a 2-dimensional immunoarray

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sorenson et al developed and evaluated a two-dimensional immunoarray (2DIA) designed to detect the three most common Burkholderia LPS types (A, B, and B2). Using a panel of 60 serum samples, they found that 2DIA had a much higher sensitivity than IHA (100 vs. 58.6 %), giving positive results for all melioidosis culture-positive/IHA-negative serums, but a lower specificity (87.1 vs. 100 %) [45]. …”
Section: Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sorenson et al developed and evaluated a two-dimensional immunoarray (2DIA) designed to detect the three most common Burkholderia LPS types (A, B, and B2). Using a panel of 60 serum samples, they found that 2DIA had a much higher sensitivity than IHA (100 vs. 58.6 %), giving positive results for all melioidosis culture-positive/IHA-negative serums, but a lower specificity (87.1 vs. 100 %) [45]. …”
Section: Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies reported that B. pseudomallei strains producing different LPS types are epidemiologically different. 20 , 21 The majority of B. pseudomallei strains are of the typical LPS type; however, 14.7% and 2.3% of strains isolated from northern Australia and southeast Asia, respectively, are of the atypical type (B, B2, or rough type). 19 Distribution of B. pseudomallei strains in newly identified endemic areas such as the Indian subcontinent, southern China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan is still largely unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, bacterial culture is an imperfect reference method because it has low sensitivity and negative predictive value (Limmathurotsakul et al 2010 ). Serological diagnosis of melioidosis is widely used in endemic regions, especially the indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA); however, it has limited utility for diagnosis because of relatively poor sensitivity (Appassakij et al 1990 ; Harris et al 2009 ; Sorenson et al 2013 ) and a high seropositivity background in endemic areas (Ashdown and Guard 1984 ; Kanaphun et al 1993 ). Although it is of limited value for diagnosis in those areas, it may be of assistance in some circumstances, particularly when paired sera are available or high serum titers are reported with the presence of clinical signs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is of limited value for diagnosis in those areas, it may be of assistance in some circumstances, particularly when paired sera are available or high serum titers are reported with the presence of clinical signs. Currently, a number of serodiagnostic tests for melioidosis detection has been developed using crude extracts (Sorenson et al 2013 ; Cooper et al 2013 ; Parthasarathy et al 2006 ) or purified recombinant proteins from B. pseudomallei (Allwood et al 2008 ; Arora et al 2015 ; Chantratita et al 2007 ; Chen et al 2003 ; Druar et al 2008 ) as antigens. Even though they obviously demonstrate substantial improvement over the clinical standard IHA test, all antigens are derived from a Tier 1 agent, B. pseudomallei , and thus manipulations must be done under biosafety level 3 (BSL-3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%