1991
DOI: 10.1021/jf00010a015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved determination of phytate by ion-exchange chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(c) Techniques for the separation of inositol phosphates (i) Liquid chromatography Several methods have been used to separate inositol phosphates, including ion-exchange (high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or conventional largecolumn ion-exchange) and size exclusion/gel filtration (table 3), although most have involved ion-exchange chromatography to isolate the individual congeners (Tangendjaja et al 1980;Camire & Clydesdale 1982;Graf & Dintzis 1982;Batty et al 1985;Wilson et al 1985;Cilliers & Van Niekerk 1986;Meek & Nicoletti 1986;Portilla & Morrison 1986;Horstman et al 1988;Matthews et al 1988;Mayr 1988;Minear et al 1988;Phillipy & Bland 1988;Heathers et al 1989;Taylor et al 1990;Bos et al 1991;Prestwich & Bolton 1991;Clarkin et al 1992;Rounds & Nielsen 1993;Wolters et al 1993;Nanny et al 1994Nanny et al , 1995Guse 1995;Suzumura & Kamatani 1995b). The ability of anion-exchange HPLC to separate the various inositol phosphate congeners effectively and efficiently has led to its widespread use.…”
Section: Analytical Techniques For the Determination Of Inositol Phosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(c) Techniques for the separation of inositol phosphates (i) Liquid chromatography Several methods have been used to separate inositol phosphates, including ion-exchange (high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or conventional largecolumn ion-exchange) and size exclusion/gel filtration (table 3), although most have involved ion-exchange chromatography to isolate the individual congeners (Tangendjaja et al 1980;Camire & Clydesdale 1982;Graf & Dintzis 1982;Batty et al 1985;Wilson et al 1985;Cilliers & Van Niekerk 1986;Meek & Nicoletti 1986;Portilla & Morrison 1986;Horstman et al 1988;Matthews et al 1988;Mayr 1988;Minear et al 1988;Phillipy & Bland 1988;Heathers et al 1989;Taylor et al 1990;Bos et al 1991;Prestwich & Bolton 1991;Clarkin et al 1992;Rounds & Nielsen 1993;Wolters et al 1993;Nanny et al 1994Nanny et al , 1995Guse 1995;Suzumura & Kamatani 1995b). The ability of anion-exchange HPLC to separate the various inositol phosphate congeners effectively and efficiently has led to its widespread use.…”
Section: Analytical Techniques For the Determination Of Inositol Phosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phytic acid determination in solid samples can be conducted in various ways, such as extracting, precipitating, and purifying the precipitate and measuring it directly or indirectly using an anion exchange column (AEC) method, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), or colorimetric method. In 1971, Oberleas used the precipitation of phytate-iron complex to analyze phytic acid; however, this method had difficulty with low phytate concentration in food (Bos et al 1991). Oberleas and Harland, in 1977, improved the Oberleas method using an AEC method (Bos et al 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1971, Oberleas used the precipitation of phytate-iron complex to analyze phytic acid; however, this method had difficulty with low phytate concentration in food (Bos et al 1991). Oberleas and Harland, in 1977, improved the Oberleas method using an AEC method (Bos et al 1991). In this method, the phytic acid was extracted from the food using a feed matrix with 2.4 % of HCl solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations