2012
DOI: 10.1172/jci64116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved detection suggests all Merkel cell carcinomas harbor Merkel polyomavirus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
176
3
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
12
176
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…DNA quantification was performed by Qubit 3.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and diluted if necessary. 15 ng input DNA was analyzed by qPCR on the StepOne real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using Taqman detection with the previously reported LT2 (LTAg) primer/probe set and SET9 (sTAg) primer/probe set (14). RNaseP TaqMan copy number reference assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) was used to normalize results and confirm adequacy of DNA for PCR.…”
Section: Dna Extraction and Quantitative Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…DNA quantification was performed by Qubit 3.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and diluted if necessary. 15 ng input DNA was analyzed by qPCR on the StepOne real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using Taqman detection with the previously reported LT2 (LTAg) primer/probe set and SET9 (sTAg) primer/probe set (14). RNaseP TaqMan copy number reference assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) was used to normalize results and confirm adequacy of DNA for PCR.…”
Section: Dna Extraction and Quantitative Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…qPCR is considered the most sensitive assay in common use for detection of MCPyV, but it has several limitations. Evaluation of multiple amplicons is necessary for maximal sensitivity, as neither LTAg nor sTAg detection alone is fully sensitive (14). In addition, low MCPyV qPCR signal may be detected due to infection by wild-type virus in normal tissues (15), and qPCR does not allow for direct correlation with morphology to confirm that the signal is originating in tumor cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2012, Rodig et al 17 was able to detect the presence of Merkel cell polyomavirus in nearly all cutaneous Merkel cell carcinomas using a novel monoclonal antibody (Ab3) and quantitative PCR. 49 The increased sensitivity of detection is likely related to shorter amplicons of PCR reactions, more primer sets, and utilization of quantitative PCR, which is more sensitive than the agarose-gel-based detection method.…”
Section: Possible Histogenesis Of Nodal Merkel Cell Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,18 Although numerous assays for Merkel cell polyomavirus detection have been reported, PCR targeting small T antigen and/or the 5' region of large T antigen is commonly used and highly sensitive. [19][20][21] Although present in the majority of Merkel cell carcinoma, Merkel cell polyomavirus has not been commonly observed in other malignancies. In particular, the presence of Merkel cell polyomavirus is highly specific for Merkel cell carcinoma relative to small cell lung carcinoma, 12,[22][23][24] and hence might be considered as a diagnostic marker in challenging cases including cytokeratin 20-negative Merkel cell carcinoma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%