2012
DOI: 10.1109/jstqe.2011.2161758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Detection Sensitivity of Line-Scanning Optical Coherence Microscopy

Abstract: Optical coherence microscopy (OCM) is a promising technology for high-resolution cellular-level imaging in human tissues. Line-scanning OCM is a new form of OCM that utilizes line-field illumination for parallel detection. In this study, we demonstrate improved detection sensitivity by using an achromatic design for line-field generation. This system operates at 830-nm wavelength with 82-nm bandwidth. The measured axial resolution is 3.9 μm in air (corresponding to ~2.9 μm in tissue), and the transverse resolu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(24 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…39,40 Several OCM methods have been reported, depending on how the sample is illuminated. 41 In the point-scanning method, an en face image is acquired by raster scanning a single spot of illumination, as with a confocal microscope. 42 However, this method is not well suited for B-scan imaging in real time because of the acquisition time.…”
Section: Technical Limitations Of Optical Coherence Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…39,40 Several OCM methods have been reported, depending on how the sample is illuminated. 41 In the point-scanning method, an en face image is acquired by raster scanning a single spot of illumination, as with a confocal microscope. 42 However, this method is not well suited for B-scan imaging in real time because of the acquisition time.…”
Section: Technical Limitations Of Optical Coherence Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the absence of a confocal gate, which results in lower detection sensitivity when compared with point-scanning and line scanning OCM. 41 A FF-OCM device (SkinTell) was commercialized by the company Agfa Healthcare for application in dermatology. B-scan imaging of skin, in vivo and in real time, is possible with the SkinTell device but with a significantly reduced penetration compared with conventional OCT 46 and a reduced spatial resolution (3 μm) compared with high-resolution FF-OCM.…”
Section: Technical Limitations Of Optical Coherence Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, there is no confocal gating mechanism in FF‐OCM to reject out‐of‐focus light. The amount of light backscattered from the sample that does not contribute to the useful interferometry signal and that is incident onto the camera sensor is usually much larger than the amount of light that does contribute to the useful interferometry signal . A camera sensor with a large dynamic range is then required to resolve the contribution of the “useful” light among all the detected light.…”
Section: Shortcomings Of Ff‐ocm For In Vivo Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, LC-OCT benefits from a confocal gate obtained with the line-scan camera that is optically conjugated with the illumination line to act as a confocal slit, along with the use of a relatively high NA microscope objective [2,17,18]. The confocal gate in LC-OCT, although less e cient than with point scanning and point detection, is beneficial for the imaging penetration depth in scattering samples [2,19]. Despite the lower detection sensitivity of TD-OCT over FD-OCT [20], the more e cient confocal spatial filtering enables LC-OCT to image in highly scattering tissues such as skin to a depth approaching that reached by FD-OCT [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%