2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00190-012-0569-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved critical values for extreme normalized and studentized residuals in Gauss–Markov models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
73
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…If on the contrary this level is chosen too high then we get too small critical values and it is likely that good observations are eliminated. Lehmann (2012) shows how to strike a balance between these impairments of parameter estimation by using MCS methods. The γ0 represents the efficiency level of the DS to identify correctly an outlying observation.…”
Section: Methods Proposal To Design Geodetic Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…If on the contrary this level is chosen too high then we get too small critical values and it is likely that good observations are eliminated. Lehmann (2012) shows how to strike a balance between these impairments of parameter estimation by using MCS methods. The γ0 represents the efficiency level of the DS to identify correctly an outlying observation.…”
Section: Methods Proposal To Design Geodetic Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic idea is to approximate probability distributions by frequency distributions of computer random experiments performed using pseudo random numbers. Therefore, as pointed out Lehmann (2012), MCS methods are used whenever the functional relationships are analytically not tractable, as is the case for DS. This simulation technique based on the pioneering idea of Hekimoglu and Koch (1999) has been recently applied in geodesy.…”
Section: Preliminary Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note, that the kurtosis estimate might be affected with gross errors (Kukuča, 1967). Thus, before application of the signifi cance testing for β 1 and β 2 , it is advisable to detect outliers by applying any of the methods presented in (Barda,1968;Lehmann, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%