2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ics.2004.03.153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved compressibility of multislice CT datasets using 3D JPEG2000 compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(13 reference statements)
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They showed, with radiologist observations, that thick slices (5mm) could be slightly more compressed that thin slices (0.67mm) to achieve the visually lossless threshold. Similar results were observed in two studies, [26] and [27], which used 3D JPEG200 compression in an effort to further increase compression ratios of CT scans. …”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 85%
“…They showed, with radiologist observations, that thick slices (5mm) could be slightly more compressed that thin slices (0.67mm) to achieve the visually lossless threshold. Similar results were observed in two studies, [26] and [27], which used 3D JPEG200 compression in an effort to further increase compression ratios of CT scans. …”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This can be directly applied to improve the acquisition in noisy conditions, case in which artifacts from any origin may be detected and removed at a low resolution so that the full reconstruction step can be avoided [24][25][26]. This is of particular interest in the group of pathologies associated with organs in constant movement, for example the lung or the heart.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of technology would allow us to acquire low-resolution prostate versions which can be mixed with the first image so that prostate changes can be better estimated and the radiation focused on the organ. Finally, mobile devices show a continuous improvement of the different displays and telemedicine applications are becoming more and more available, case in which progressive transmission in low-band channels is possible [25,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 One of the most popular compression algorithms is Joint Photographic Experts Group 2000 ͑JPEG2000͒, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]19 which compresses an image by exploiting the data redundancy within the image ͑or intraslice correlation͒. Recently, JPEG2000 3D ͑part 2͒ has been advocated as being more effective than JPEG2000 in compressing CT image data sets 20,[22][23][24][25] by further compressing the data sets in the third dimension through exploitation of the data redundancy between adjacent images ͑or interslice correlation͒. JPEG2000 and JPEG2000 3D have been adopted in the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine ͑DICOM͒ standard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%