2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-013-3129-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved clinical and economic outcomes in severe bronchiolitis with pre-emptive nCPAP ventilatory strategy

Abstract: nCPAP in severe bronchiolitis is associated with a significant improvement in patient management as shown by the reduction in invasive care, LOV, PICU LOS, hospital LOS, and economic burden.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
82
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(5 reference statements)
8
82
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Their analysis suggests a clinical and cost improvement of nCPAP including a shorter duration of ventilatory support (hazard ratio 1.8, 95 % CI 1.5-2.2, p \ 0.001) and a 3-day reduction in both PICU and hospital length of stay. They estimate savings in their unit of around €700,000/year with this approach [63].…”
Section: Respiratory and Mechanical Ventilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their analysis suggests a clinical and cost improvement of nCPAP including a shorter duration of ventilatory support (hazard ratio 1.8, 95 % CI 1.5-2.2, p \ 0.001) and a 3-day reduction in both PICU and hospital length of stay. They estimate savings in their unit of around €700,000/year with this approach [63].…”
Section: Respiratory and Mechanical Ventilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is widely provided as first-line NRS by many PICU teams. [7][8][9] In infants, the choice of interface is crucial for NRS success. Currently, pediatric interfaces include nasal cannulas, nasal and facial mask, and pediatric helmet.…”
Section: Respiratory Syncytial Virus (Rsv)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the primary outcome is a composite endpoint comprising criteria for lack of clinical improvement as well as intolerance to the applied intervention, making it difficult to reproduce in other studies and to compare with other trials. It is also arguable whether the primary outcome is really a clinically important outcome; endotracheal intubation would certainly have been one, but the low rate of intubation in bronchiolitis in the current era (<5%) would have necessitated a much larger sample size [7,12]. The duration of non-invasive ventilation (HFNC, CPAP and/or BIPAP) was greater in HFNC patients (98.3 vs 72.9 h, p = 0.2), suggesting that length of ventilation may be a candidate outcome in future trials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%