2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.141401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved catalytic activity and stability of Cu/ZnO catalyst by boron oxide modification for low-temperature methanol synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…XRD characterization was performed on each catalyst for 3 h of hydrogen reduction at 400 °C, as shown in Figure b. It could be found that the peaks of CuO disappear, and the peaks at 2θ = 43.3°, 50.3°, and 74.2° were detected, which can be ascribed to Cu (PDF #85–1326) . The peaks of ZnO and ZrO 2 could also be clearly detected, indicating that the carrier was not destroyed after high-temperature reduction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XRD characterization was performed on each catalyst for 3 h of hydrogen reduction at 400 °C, as shown in Figure b. It could be found that the peaks of CuO disappear, and the peaks at 2θ = 43.3°, 50.3°, and 74.2° were detected, which can be ascribed to Cu (PDF #85–1326) . The peaks of ZnO and ZrO 2 could also be clearly detected, indicating that the carrier was not destroyed after high-temperature reduction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cu 2p spectra of all spent catalysts are compared in Figure a. The Cu 2p 3/2 and Cu 2p 1/2 peaks located at 932.7 and 952.5 eV were assigned to the Cu 0 /Cu + species, and there were no Cu 2+ peaks. , The binding energy of Er 0.2 CuZnO was 0.19 eV lower than that of CuZnO. By contrast, the binding energy of Er 0.5 CuZnO and Er 1 CuZnO was comparable and higher than that of Er 0.2 CuZnO, indicating that Cu nanoparticles on the latter had a higher electron density, forming Cu δ− species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). In a very recent study using co‐fed CH 3 OH as a “promoter”, the selectivity to methyl formate (up to 2.5 %) was observed in the course of CO/CO 2 hydrogenation to CH 3 OH at 200 °C and 70 bar [25] . CH3OH+HCOO*HCOOCH3+HO* $\vcenter{\openup.5em\halign{$\displaystyle{#}$\cr {\rm CH}{_{3}}{\rm OH}+{\rm HCOO}^{\ast }{\stackrel{{\leftarrow}} {{\rightarrow} } }{\rm HCOOCH}{_{3}}+{\rm HO}^{\ast }\hfill\cr}}$ HCOOCH3+2normalH22CH3OH,ΔH25C=-46.5kJmol-1 $\vcenter{\openup.5em\halign{$\displaystyle{#}$\cr {\rm HCOOCH}{_{3}}+{\rm 2H}{_{2}}{\stackrel{{\leftarrow}} {{\rightarrow} } }{\rm 2CH}{_{3}}{\rm OH}{\rm \char44 }\ \Delta {\rm H}{_{25\mskip2mu {\circ}{\rm C}}}=- 46.5\mskip4mu {\rm kJ}\mskip2mu {\rm mol}{^{- 1}}\hfill\cr}}$ …”
Section: Co2 Hydrogenation To Ch3oh Over Cu‐based Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%