2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2005.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved binary parameters using GA for multi-component aromatic extraction: NRTL model without and with closure equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 shows the comparison of the performance of Simulated Annealing (SA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Differential Evolution (DE) [13] and HS method for parameter estimation using LS formulation. It is convenient to note that previous studies have reported a robust performance of DE [13], PSO [14,[32][33][34], SA [11,13,32] and GA [12,35] for solving global optimization problems in the modeling of phase equilibrium including parameter estimation problems. To directly examine and compare the performance of HS with those obtained for other stochastic methods using LS approach, we keep their numerical efforts the same via NFE and analyze the results obtained in terms of GSR.…”
Section: Performance Of Traditional Hs Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 shows the comparison of the performance of Simulated Annealing (SA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Differential Evolution (DE) [13] and HS method for parameter estimation using LS formulation. It is convenient to note that previous studies have reported a robust performance of DE [13], PSO [14,[32][33][34], SA [11,13,32] and GA [12,35] for solving global optimization problems in the modeling of phase equilibrium including parameter estimation problems. To directly examine and compare the performance of HS with those obtained for other stochastic methods using LS approach, we keep their numerical efforts the same via NFE and analyze the results obtained in terms of GSR.…”
Section: Performance Of Traditional Hs Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are often used to solve phase equilibrium problems. But because the search space is highly nonlinear consisting of local and global minima's, the local methods may converge to a local optimum point (Stragevitch and Davila 1997;Sahoo et al 2006). In recent past the stochastic optimization techniques (such as differential evolution (DE), genetic algorithms (GA), simulated annealing (SA), particle swarm algorithm, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They proved that their results were better than local search methods. In another study (Sahoo et al 2006;Sahoo et al 2007), GA was used to estimate ternary, quaternary and quinary LLE interaction parameters for NRTL and UNIQUAC models. It was reported that GA results were better than other techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, stochastic global optimization methods have been used extensively in fluid phase equilibrium problems and parameter estimation of models. Among these methods, GA is the most widely used (Alvarez et al 2008;Bonilla-Petriciolet et al 2013;Chamkalani et al 2013;Maddinelli and Pavoni 2013;Rangaiah 2001;Singh et al 2005;Sahoo et al 2006;Sahoo et al 2007;Tan et al 2014;Vakili-Nezhaad et al 2013;Vakili-Nezhaad et al 2014;Vatani et al 2012a;Vatani et al 2012b;Xue et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%