In the classical Steiner tree problem, given an undirected, connected graph G = (V , E) with non-negative edge costs and a set of terminals T ⊆ V , the objective is to find a minimum-cost tree E ′ ⊆ E that spans the terminals. The problem is APX-hard; the best known approximation algorithm has a ratio of ρ = ln(4) + ε < 1.39. In this paper, we study a natural generalization, the multi-level Steiner tree (MLST) problem: given a nested sequence of terminals T ℓ ⊂ · · · ⊂ T 1 ⊆ V , compute nested trees E ℓ ⊆ · · · ⊆ E 1 ⊆ E that span the corresponding terminal sets with minimum total cost.The MLST problem and variants thereof have been studied under various names including Multi-level Network Design, Quality-of-Service Multicast tree, Grade-of-Service Steiner tree, and Multi-Tier tree. Several approximation results are known. We first present two simple O(ℓ)-approximation heuristics. Based on these, we introduce a rudimentary composite algorithm that generalizes the above heuristics, and determine its approximation ratio by solving a linear program. We then present a method that guarantees the same approximation ratio using at most 2ℓ Steiner tree computations. We compare these heuristics experimentally on various instances of up to 500 vertices using three different network generation models. We also present various integer linear programming (ILP) formulations for the MLST problem, and compare their running times on these instances. To our knowledge, the composite algorithm achieves the best approximation ratio for up to ℓ = 100 levels, which is sufficient for most applications such as network visualization or designing multi-level infrastructure.Let G = (V , E) be an undirected, connected graph with positive edge costs c : E → R + , and let T ⊆ V be a set of vertices called terminals. A Steiner tree is a tree in G that spans T . The network (graph) Steiner tree problem (ST) is to find a minimum-cost Steiner tree E ′ ⊆ E, where the cost of E ′ is c(E ′ ) = e ∈E ′ c(e). ST is one of Karp's initial NP-hard problems [12]; see also a survey [21], an online compendium [11], and a textbook [18].Due to its practical importance in many domains, there is a long history of exact and approximation algorithms for the problem. The classical 2-approximation algorithm for ST [10] uses the metric closure of G, i.e., the complete edge-weighted graph G * with vertex set T in which, for every edge uv, the cost of uv equals the length of a shortest u-v path in G. A minimum spanning tree of G * corresponds to a 2-approximate Steiner tree in G.Currently, the last in a long list of improvements is the LP-based approximation algorithm of Byrka et al. [5], which has a ratio of ln(4) + ε < 1.39. Their algorithm uses a new iterative randomized rounding technique. Note that ST is APX-hard [4]; more concretely, it is NP-hard to approximate the problem within a factor of 96/95 [7]. This is in contrast to the geometric variant of the problem, where terminals correspond to points in the Euclidean or rectilinear plane. Both variants admit polynom...