2012
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2012.2203112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Analytical Modeling of Axial Flux Machine With a Double-Sided Permanent Magnet Rotor and Slotless Stator Based on an Analytical Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By taking into account AWT cruising speed, the volumetric flow rate is assumed here to have a value of 7 dm 3 /s (Table 3). Finally, the air temperature inside the air gap θ g and the stator temperature θ s can be acquired from (14) and (15), respectively…”
Section: Thermal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By taking into account AWT cruising speed, the volumetric flow rate is assumed here to have a value of 7 dm 3 /s (Table 3). Finally, the air temperature inside the air gap θ g and the stator temperature θ s can be acquired from (14) and (15), respectively…”
Section: Thermal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the laminated electrical steel sheets can only be used for 2D flux guidance. In comparison with the laminated electrical steel sheets, SMC materials can be pressed into any shape easily with almost no remnant and it suits 3D flux applications with anisotropy [10][11][12][13][14][15]. In this paper, stator shoes and stator bars are manufactured from SMC materials, and the main design parameters are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Yokeless and Segmented Armature Axial Flux Motorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a single‐sided axial magnet generator will results in excessive axial attraction [1]. A double‐sided permanent magnet rotor with a single stator [2, 3] can offset the axial attraction and increase the output power at the cost of an increased weight. The double‐sided permanent magnet rotor design can also reduce bearing wear and noise problem compared with a single‐sided structure, which thus increases the generator reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%