2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2011.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved analytical methodology for calculation assessment of material parameters in the nuclear installation decommissioning process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculation of material and radiological parameters of conditionally released materials. The decommissioning planning code OMEGA (developed in the DECOM company) with newly implemented calculation stream evaluating the conditional release is used [9]. The necessary inputs for calculation are:…”
Section: Methodology For Scenarios Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculation of material and radiological parameters of conditionally released materials. The decommissioning planning code OMEGA (developed in the DECOM company) with newly implemented calculation stream evaluating the conditional release is used [9]. The necessary inputs for calculation are:…”
Section: Methodology For Scenarios Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the OMEGA code, the standardized ISDC (International Structure for Decommissioning Costing) structure, issued by international organizations (IAEA, NEA/OECD, EC) as a tool systemizing the decommissioning cost items, is used for arranging all decommissioning activities included in the calculation. General purposes of ISDC structure are to facilitate communication, to promote uniformity, to avoid inconsistency or contradiction of results of costs evaluations and to be of worldwide interests to all decommissioners [2], [11].…”
Section: B General Description Of Omega Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tools are often structured according to the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) approach [1,2]. Despite of this approach being adequate from the engineering point of view due to the high level of detail, its use require a very large database, previous experience in field or assumptions that not always represents the site characteristics, the process objectives or strategical planning of the operator, since the process beginning [1,2,[6][7][8][9][10][11]. On the other hand, the top-down approach requires a reduced quantity of data in the process beginning, despite some previous experience is still desirable, and thus, is preferable in the project beginning instead the bottom-up approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%