2018
DOI: 10.1145/3282435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Analysis of Deterministic Load-Balancing Schemes

Abstract: We consider the problem of deterministic load balancing of tokens in the discrete model. A set of n processors is connected into a d-regular undirected network. In every time step, each processor exchanges some of its tokens with each of its neighbors in the network. The goal is to minimize the discrepancy between the number of tokens on the most-loaded and the least-loaded processor as quickly as possible. Rabani et al. (1998) present a general technique for the analysis of a wide class of discrete load balan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hassin and Peleg [26] showed t coal ≤ t meet log n, while t meet ≤ t coal is trivial. Recent works on the meeting and coalescing times consider the lazy simple random walk on a connected graph G [8,17,31,40]. For example, Kanade, Mallmann-Trenn, and Sauerwald [31] showed…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hassin and Peleg [26] showed t coal ≤ t meet log n, while t meet ≤ t coal is trivial. Recent works on the meeting and coalescing times consider the lazy simple random walk on a connected graph G [8,17,31,40]. For example, Kanade, Mallmann-Trenn, and Sauerwald [31] showed…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berenbrink, Giakkoupis, Kermarrec, and Mallmann-trenn [8] studied the pull voting according to (P LS (G t )) t≥1 for a sequence (G t ) t≥1 of graphs constructed by an adaptive adversary. That is, for every t, the graph G t can depend on the history of opinion configurations.…”
Section: Pull Votingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stabilization can take Θ(n) time in the worst case, but it takes only O(log n) time for all agents to hold three consecutive values (two of which are ⌊m/n⌋ or ⌈m/n⌉) [25,29]. The discrete averaging technique has been crucial in a number of polylogarithmic-time protocols for problems such as population size counting [22,23] and majority related problems [13,17,28,29] and its time complexity has been tightly analyzed [17,25,26,30].…”
Section: Fast Averaging Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tightly analyzed in [17,23,25,26,30], that has since been widely deployed in other protocols to solve the counting problem [17,22,23,29] and the exact majority problem [18,28,29]. (See Protocols 2 and 5.…”
Section: Conclusion and Open Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%