2016
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erw154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved analysis of C4and C3photosynthesis via refinedin vitroassays of their carbon fixation biochemistry

Abstract: HighlightWe provide improved biochemical assays for key carboxylases and decarboxylases involved in C3 and C4 photosynthesis. Together with leaf age-related changes in Rubisco activation, these measurements will improve photosynthetic modelling.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
68
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
6
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At 25°C, differences in Γ * and K o between species and photosynthetic mechanisms were non-significant, indicative that maize Rubisco presents a higher maximum catalytic turnover for the carboxylation reaction (k cat c ) than the two C 3 species, which is in agreement with recent studies (Sharwood et al, 2016a,b). The response of Rubisco kinetics to increased temperature followed trends already described in the literature, both in vivo (Brooks and Farquhar, 1985; Bernacchi et al, 2001; Walker et al, 2013) and in vitro in C 3 and C 4 species (Badger and Collatz, 1977; Jordan and Ogren, 1984; Galmés et al, 2005; Boyd et al, 2015), with increases in K c , K o , K c /K o , and Γ * (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…At 25°C, differences in Γ * and K o between species and photosynthetic mechanisms were non-significant, indicative that maize Rubisco presents a higher maximum catalytic turnover for the carboxylation reaction (k cat c ) than the two C 3 species, which is in agreement with recent studies (Sharwood et al, 2016a,b). The response of Rubisco kinetics to increased temperature followed trends already described in the literature, both in vivo (Brooks and Farquhar, 1985; Bernacchi et al, 2001; Walker et al, 2013) and in vitro in C 3 and C 4 species (Badger and Collatz, 1977; Jordan and Ogren, 1984; Galmés et al, 2005; Boyd et al, 2015), with increases in K c , K o , K c /K o , and Γ * (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In this decarbamylated form, the catalytic site is again prone to inhibitory binding by RuBP (i.e. the formation of an ER complex), a substantial source of Rubisco inhibition in leaves under illumination (Sharwood et al, 2016b). Under these conditions, RCA is critical for ensuring RuBP removal from ER complexes to limit the level at which they accumulate.…”
Section: Catalytic Mechanisminhibition By Rubp and Maintenance Of Rubmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, PEPC/Rubisco ratio has been reported to be adjusted in order to minimize the leakage of CO2 from the bundle sheath (Kromdijk et al 2008). Interspecific variation in PEPC/Rubisco ratio was also reported by Sharwood et al (2016). The increase in PEPC/Rubisco ratio in E. crus-galli from wet habitat grown in semi-dry soil suggest an increased demand for primary CO2 fixation perhaps due to decreased availability of CO2 in the mesophyll cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%