Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
In the Gulf of Mexico, the rapid pressure depletion and reservoir depth of the Lower Tertiary intervals lead to low oil recovery. A high-reliability, through-tubing subsea electrical submersible pump (ESP) system that takes an integrated approach to production optimization will enable producers to cost-effectively extract more hydrocarbons from the increasingly challenging reservoirs in today's subsea assets. The potential increase in production depends on the maximum drawdown pressure limitations of both well casing design and rock strength. ESPs in deepwater fields are also considered to be an enhancer rather than an enabler by extending the production plateau 5 to 8 years after initial well/field startup with natural flow and seabed boosting. Hence, a robust ESP system that can be installed and operated a few years after field startup without a workover for replacing the upper completions. A robust, reliable ESP would unlock additional value to deepwater operators by delaying CAPEX and eliminating ESP failures, such as degradation of components due to high-pressure/high-temperature (HP/HT) cycling, during the first few years of nonoperation. Designing ESPs for deepwater application is a multidisciplinary challenge and needs to be approached from a full system-reliability standpoint rather than improvements to the ESP hardware alone. Implementation of ESPs in deep water requires both upfront planning at a full-system level and high degree of flexibility for installation, deployment, and retrieval. Finally, because the impact of an unplanned ESP failure is significantly detrimental to project economics, efforts to improve robustness of the ESP hardware must be complemented with automation of ESP operation to reduce or eliminate operator-induced failures. Recent industry improvements in machine learning and predictive analytics need to be leveraged to implement condition-based monitoring of ESPs to better anticipate failures and plan for replacements and/or adjustments to extend the life of degraded units. A collaborative project was undertaken to develop the concept of an alternatively deployed through-tubing ESP (TTESP) system targeted for deepwater subsea operations. The goal was to reduce intervention costs, which, together with ESP run life, are the primary factors influencing the economics of subsea ESPs, including conventionally deployed through-tubing ESPs. The project scope encompassed the downhole hardware, from immediately below the subsea tree through the upper completion, as well as deployment and retrieval equipment and methodology. Economic analyses of subsea fields were conducted to identify the factors contributing to intervention costs so that alternatives could be developed. Multiple concepts were evaluated, and the proof-of-concept system was selected based on superior economic return compared with the baseline. During this proof-of-concept phase, significant testing of key technologies was conducted. The studies showed that conventional intervention vessels and methods will not reduce the intervention costs associated with TTESPs. Lighter vessels together with technologies and methods that minimize intervention time and frequency—and, consequently, reservoir damage and deferred production—are the answer. Eliminating the wait for an available offshore rig is also a key factor in improving overall production economics. The proposed alternatively deployed TTESP system and its associated deployment methodology could reduce the intervention time by half and eliminate reservoir damage. This unconventional deployment could be conducted with lighter service vessels, further reducing intervention costs.
In the Gulf of Mexico, the rapid pressure depletion and reservoir depth of the Lower Tertiary intervals lead to low oil recovery. A high-reliability, through-tubing subsea electrical submersible pump (ESP) system that takes an integrated approach to production optimization will enable producers to cost-effectively extract more hydrocarbons from the increasingly challenging reservoirs in today's subsea assets. The potential increase in production depends on the maximum drawdown pressure limitations of both well casing design and rock strength. ESPs in deepwater fields are also considered to be an enhancer rather than an enabler by extending the production plateau 5 to 8 years after initial well/field startup with natural flow and seabed boosting. Hence, a robust ESP system that can be installed and operated a few years after field startup without a workover for replacing the upper completions. A robust, reliable ESP would unlock additional value to deepwater operators by delaying CAPEX and eliminating ESP failures, such as degradation of components due to high-pressure/high-temperature (HP/HT) cycling, during the first few years of nonoperation. Designing ESPs for deepwater application is a multidisciplinary challenge and needs to be approached from a full system-reliability standpoint rather than improvements to the ESP hardware alone. Implementation of ESPs in deep water requires both upfront planning at a full-system level and high degree of flexibility for installation, deployment, and retrieval. Finally, because the impact of an unplanned ESP failure is significantly detrimental to project economics, efforts to improve robustness of the ESP hardware must be complemented with automation of ESP operation to reduce or eliminate operator-induced failures. Recent industry improvements in machine learning and predictive analytics need to be leveraged to implement condition-based monitoring of ESPs to better anticipate failures and plan for replacements and/or adjustments to extend the life of degraded units. A collaborative project was undertaken to develop the concept of an alternatively deployed through-tubing ESP (TTESP) system targeted for deepwater subsea operations. The goal was to reduce intervention costs, which, together with ESP run life, are the primary factors influencing the economics of subsea ESPs, including conventionally deployed through-tubing ESPs. The project scope encompassed the downhole hardware, from immediately below the subsea tree through the upper completion, as well as deployment and retrieval equipment and methodology. Economic analyses of subsea fields were conducted to identify the factors contributing to intervention costs so that alternatives could be developed. Multiple concepts were evaluated, and the proof-of-concept system was selected based on superior economic return compared with the baseline. During this proof-of-concept phase, significant testing of key technologies was conducted. The studies showed that conventional intervention vessels and methods will not reduce the intervention costs associated with TTESPs. Lighter vessels together with technologies and methods that minimize intervention time and frequency—and, consequently, reservoir damage and deferred production—are the answer. Eliminating the wait for an available offshore rig is also a key factor in improving overall production economics. The proposed alternatively deployed TTESP system and its associated deployment methodology could reduce the intervention time by half and eliminate reservoir damage. This unconventional deployment could be conducted with lighter service vessels, further reducing intervention costs.
This is a study on how subsea processing be the enabling technologies for future ultra-deepwater field developments and long distance tiebacks. This study identifies the gaps that need to be closed and decision making process during the field development life cycle by considering both the technical and economic constraints of various subsea processing technologies. As E&P companies continue to explore for oil & gas deeper and further into sea, the challenges associated with developing the deepwater fields are bound to escalate. Subsea processing technologies are the fastest growing technologies due to their huge potential to increase recoverable reserves and to accelerate production. It also enables for cost saving by moving some of the traditional topsides processing to seabed. As the reliability of subsea processing equipment is increasing, the industry is gaining more confidence in subsea processing. As industry gains more experience of design and operating subsea processing technologies, and closing the gaps, it improves understanding of the technology and making advancement to counter the challenges associated with harsher environments and complex fields. Properly-designed modularized compact subsea processing kits can be economic to deploy, and may potentially become an enabler for certain types of marginal field developments. This paper addresses the challenges of reservoir characteristics and fluid properties, cost, risk, reliability, operability, installability, maintainability and intervention complexities; assesses the existing and emerging technologies; focuses on improving efficient compact design to reduce bulky and heavy equipment, achieving separation from heavy oil, and disposal of separated water. Certainly there are limitations in making the subsea processing viable and accessible to all operators but the technology needs and industry collaboration should overcome these challenges. Also there are opportunities for improvement and standardization, and modular design processing systems for reservoir suitability, field layout and topsides support.
The first subsea multiphase boosting system was installed in 1994 and it is today a proven technology with a global track record. In addition to bringing increased production and recovery, multiphase boosting may also reduce flow assurance issues, reduce project CAPEX and OPEX, improve operability and safety as well as reduce the greenhouse gas emissions when compared to gas lift, the default lifting solution. A review of the evaluation process and drivers during subsea artificial lift evaluations over the last three decades indicates that in general only a few of the actual upsides of subsea multiphase boosting have been considered, suggesting that there is a need for a more complete overview of the advantages and an approach to uncovering and quantifying the actual value. This paper discusses the different aspects of subsea multiphase boosting through a comprehensive list of tangible benefits that may support the field development decision process towards identifying the potentially significant and hidden value of subsea multiphase boosting. Referencing experience from more than 30 installations it also provides a historical summary of the various aspects of subsea boosting and which drivers were and were not considered during the decision making process.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.