2022
DOI: 10.1080/00207217.2021.1964615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improve Performance of Induction Motor Drive using Weighting Factor approach-based Gravitational Search Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Weighting factor removal by reference transformation 33,34 Higher computational burden as compared with conventional PTC and difficult to incorporate multiple control objectives 35 Weighting factor tuning based on coefficient of variation 36 Optimized weights are uncertain in this method and complex calculations are required to implement on hardware Weighting factor tuning based on TOPSIS and NSGA-II methods 37 TOPSIS and NSGA-II algorithms require complex calculations leading to computational challenges 12 Weighting factor removal by Ranking method 38 Ranking based techniques become unfeasible as number of control objectives increases 39 Tuning of weighting factor based on simple additive technique 40 Although technique is simple but not suitable for multiple control objectives 11 Weighting factor tuning based on current ripples 41 Highly dependent on parameter estimation 8,42 Tuning of weighting factor based on error of control objectives 43 This method becomes challenging and complex when number of control objectives increases 44 Weighting factor tuning using Genetic Algorithm (GA) 45 , Simulated Annealing (SA) 42 or Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA) 43 , Artificial Neural Network 46 , Ant colony based optimization 47 These algorithms are very complex and pose computational challenges 48 Weighting factor tuning based on algebraic/numerical techniques 49 Design complexity increases as slection of weighting factor increases 50 Weighting factor selection based on homogeneous cost functions [51][52][53] This technique is relatively efficient but unable to include multiple control objectives 54 Direct vector selection based techniques to remove weighting factors from cost function 55,56 Direct vector selection techniques provid lower computational burden and lower complexity , however cannot incorporate multiple control objecitve 57 Weighting factor elimination by using cascaded structure of FCS-MPC …”
Section: Ptc Methods Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Weighting factor removal by reference transformation 33,34 Higher computational burden as compared with conventional PTC and difficult to incorporate multiple control objectives 35 Weighting factor tuning based on coefficient of variation 36 Optimized weights are uncertain in this method and complex calculations are required to implement on hardware Weighting factor tuning based on TOPSIS and NSGA-II methods 37 TOPSIS and NSGA-II algorithms require complex calculations leading to computational challenges 12 Weighting factor removal by Ranking method 38 Ranking based techniques become unfeasible as number of control objectives increases 39 Tuning of weighting factor based on simple additive technique 40 Although technique is simple but not suitable for multiple control objectives 11 Weighting factor tuning based on current ripples 41 Highly dependent on parameter estimation 8,42 Tuning of weighting factor based on error of control objectives 43 This method becomes challenging and complex when number of control objectives increases 44 Weighting factor tuning using Genetic Algorithm (GA) 45 , Simulated Annealing (SA) 42 or Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA) 43 , Artificial Neural Network 46 , Ant colony based optimization 47 These algorithms are very complex and pose computational challenges 48 Weighting factor tuning based on algebraic/numerical techniques 49 Design complexity increases as slection of weighting factor increases 50 Weighting factor selection based on homogeneous cost functions [51][52][53] This technique is relatively efficient but unable to include multiple control objectives 54 Direct vector selection based techniques to remove weighting factors from cost function 55,56 Direct vector selection techniques provid lower computational burden and lower complexity , however cannot incorporate multiple control objecitve 57 Weighting factor elimination by using cascaded structure of FCS-MPC …”
Section: Ptc Methods Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, online computing of weighting factor by such methods limits the search accuracy and increases the computational complexity 47 . Other meta-heuristic methods include gravitational search algorithm (GSA) 43 , non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) [10][11][12] . ANN methods are reported in 46,[63][64][65][66] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inverter has weak resistance to Sustainability 2022, 14, 8510 2 of 15 current and is prone to overcurrent. The synchronous motor has a strong ability to cope with external disturbances due to its structural characteristics, while the inverter topology is mainly composed of power electronic devices, which have limited bearing capacity and poor resistance in case of system failure [6]. Therefore, the characteristics of the synchronous motor can ensure the stable operation of the power system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%