Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
The Cambridge Companion to T. S. Eliot 1994
DOI: 10.1017/ccol0521420806.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improper desire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the QCD axion, we obtain M 0 5×10 −10 M based on the axion mass parameterization used in Buschmann et al (2019) and the the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom presented by Husdal (2016) (see Appendix A). After accounting for a factor of 4 π 4 /3 ≈ 130 larger in our definition, this number is compatible with the characteristic masses for the first gravitationally collapsed axion minihalos quoted in other references (Davidson & Schwetz 2016;Hardy 2017;Fairbairn et al 2018). We therefore estimate that the typical mass for the first collapsed axion minihalos is ∼ 0.01 M 0 , and is ∼ 5 × 10 −12 M for QCD axions.…”
Section: Isocurvature Density Fluctuations In Axion Cosmologysupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the QCD axion, we obtain M 0 5×10 −10 M based on the axion mass parameterization used in Buschmann et al (2019) and the the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom presented by Husdal (2016) (see Appendix A). After accounting for a factor of 4 π 4 /3 ≈ 130 larger in our definition, this number is compatible with the characteristic masses for the first gravitationally collapsed axion minihalos quoted in other references (Davidson & Schwetz 2016;Hardy 2017;Fairbairn et al 2018). We therefore estimate that the typical mass for the first collapsed axion minihalos is ∼ 0.01 M 0 , and is ∼ 5 × 10 −12 M for QCD axions.…”
Section: Isocurvature Density Fluctuations In Axion Cosmologysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…We note that our definition of M 0 is adopted from Fairbairn et al (2018), which is a factor 4 π 4 /3 larger than what is used in several other references (e.g. Davidson & Schwetz 2016;Hardy 2017). Following the definition of the latter authors, the typical mass for the smallest minihalos that collapse the earliest from gravitational instability should be two orders of magnitude smaller than M 0 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…When this happens, the commonly made assumption that the axion fluid obeys classical field equations is unjustified. Classical field equations are still valid, of course, as a description of stable or metastable objects in the axion fluid such as flat domain walls [13], straight strings [14] and Bose stars [15], [6], [7], [16] since thermalization plays no role for them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some references on possible consequences and observations connected with axion miniclusters and axion stars see refs. [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], and for work on their structure and stability see refs [23,41,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. For work on the possible unique signatures of axion structure formation due to their quantum mechanical properties as light degenerate bosons see refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%