2019
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/03/004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imprints of local lightcone projection effects on the galaxy bispectrum IV: second-order vector and tensor contributions

Abstract: The galaxy bispectrum on scales around and above the equality scale receives contributions from relativistic effects. Some of these arise from lightcone deformation effects, which come from local and line-of-sight integrated contributions. Here we calculate the local contributions from the generated vector and tensor background which is formed as scalar modes couple and enter the horizon. We show that these modes are sub-dominant when compared with other relativistic contributions. *

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of vector modes on LSS observables is expected to be small relative to the scalar perturbations, both from perturbative (Lu et al 2009) and non-perturbative analyses (Bruni et al 2014;Adamek et al 2016b), although it can represent a new systematic which needs to be taken into account (Bonvin et al 2018). For instance, their effect on gravitational lensing seems to be not strong enough to be detectable by current observations (Thomas et al 2015a;Saga et al 2015;Gressel et al 2019), and the imprints of the vector potential in the angular power spectrum and bispectrum of galaxies are also weak (Durrer & Tansella 2016;Jolicoeur et al 2019), although a vector perturbation can be isolated from the full signal if it violates statistical isotropy and defines a preferred frame (see, e.g., Tansella et al 2018). On the other hand, the vector potential power spectrum is known to peak around the equality scale (Lu et al 2009), and its behaviour as well as impact on observables at highly nonlinear scales remains largely unexplored, although deviations from perturbation theory can be significant (Bruni et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The impact of vector modes on LSS observables is expected to be small relative to the scalar perturbations, both from perturbative (Lu et al 2009) and non-perturbative analyses (Bruni et al 2014;Adamek et al 2016b), although it can represent a new systematic which needs to be taken into account (Bonvin et al 2018). For instance, their effect on gravitational lensing seems to be not strong enough to be detectable by current observations (Thomas et al 2015a;Saga et al 2015;Gressel et al 2019), and the imprints of the vector potential in the angular power spectrum and bispectrum of galaxies are also weak (Durrer & Tansella 2016;Jolicoeur et al 2019), although a vector perturbation can be isolated from the full signal if it violates statistical isotropy and defines a preferred frame (see, e.g., Tansella et al 2018). On the other hand, the vector potential power spectrum is known to peak around the equality scale (Lu et al 2009), and its behaviour as well as impact on observables at highly nonlinear scales remains largely unexplored, although deviations from perturbation theory can be significant (Bruni et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Apart from RSD, the remaining 'projection' effects from observing in redshift space are ultra-large scale relativistic effects, which arise from Doppler, Sachs-Wolfe, integrated SW and time-delay terms, and their cross-correlations with each other and the dominant density and RSD terms (at first order, see [14][15][16] and at second-order see [11,13,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]). These relativistic effects are all suppressed in Fourier space by factors (H/k) n , where n ≥ 2 in the power spectrum [14][15][16] and n ≥ 1 in the bispectrum [13,24,25], and we will neglect them.…”
Section: = ∆mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(B.17) 31 Of course, this description holds only for the diffeomorphisms that are connected to the identity.…”
Section: Example: the Photon-electron-proton Fluidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear order perturbation theory around the homogeneous and isotropic solution is well understood and documented, but is often insufficient for matching the aforementioned precision requirements. This is why, in the last decade, the community has been actively investigating the impact of second-order effects in the CMB lensing [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], in galaxy number counts [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] and cosmological distances and weak lensing [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%